Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384390›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Protocol for tumour-focused dose-escalated adaptive radiotherapy for the radical treatment of bladder cancer in a multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial (RAIDER): radiotherapy planning and delivery guidance.

Shaista Hafeez, Amanda Webster, Vibeke N Hansen, Helen A McNair, Karole Warren-Oseni, Emma Patel, Ananya Choudhury, Joanne Creswell, Farshad Foroudi, Ann Henry and 10 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02447549 (A Randomised Phase II Trial of Adaptive Image Guided Standard or Dose Escalated Tumour Boost Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02447549 phase2active not recruitingnot on this map

A Randomised Phase II Trial of Adaptive Image Guided Standard or Dose Escalated Tumour Boost Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitute of Cancer Research, United KingdomRan2015 to 2029Enrolled345ConditionsBladder CancerArmsWBRT, SART, DART
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mapping Local Failure Following Bladder Radiotherapy According to Dose.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2022
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of on-trial IGRT quality assurance in an international adaptive radiotherapy trial for participants with bladder cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Recognising the challenges of implementing multi-centre adaptive plan of the day radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.

Shaista HafeezRadiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK shaista.hafeez@icr.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-2057-0946
Amanda WebsterNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
Vibeke N HansenLaboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
Helen A McNairRadiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Karole Warren-OseniJoint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Emma PatelNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
Ananya ChoudhuryDivision of Cancer Studies, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Joanne CreswellDepartment of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.
Farshad ForoudiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Ann HenryLeeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Tomas KronDepartment of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Duncan B McLarenEdinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK.
Anita V MitraCancer Services, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hugh MostafidThe Stokes Centre for Urology, Royal Surrey Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, Surrey, UK.
Daniel SaundersDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.
Elizabeth MilesNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance Group (RTTQA), Mount Vernon Hospital, Northwood, UK.
Clare GriffinClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Rebecca LewisClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Emma HallClinical Trials and Statistics Unit, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Robert HuddartRadiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBMount Vernon Hospital · GBAustin Health · AUJames Cook University Hospital · GBNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust · GBOdense University Hospital · DKPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of Manchester · GBWestern General Hospital · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17533Cancer Research UK CRUK/14/016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDaily radiotherapy delivered with radiosensitisation offers patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) comparable outcomes to cystectomy with functional organ preservation. Most recurrences following radiotherapy occur within the bladder. Increasing the delivered radiotherapy dose to the tumour may further improve local control. Developments in image-guided radiotherapy have allowed bladder tumour-focused 'plan of the day' radiotherapy delivery. We aim to test within a randomised multicentre phase II trial whether this technique will enable dose escalation with acceptable rates of toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with T2-T4aN0M0 unifocal MIBC will be randomised (1:1:2) between standard/control whole bladder single plan radiotherapy, standard dose adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy or dose-escalated adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy (DART). Adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy will use a library of three plans (small, medium and large) for treatment. A cone beam CT taken prior to each treatment will be used to visualise the anatomy and inform selection of the most appropriate plan for treatment.Two radiotherapy fractionation schedules (32f and 20f) are permitted. A minimum of 120 participants will be randomised in each fractionation cohort (to ensure 57 evaluable DART patients per cohort).A comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance programme including pretrial and on-trial components is instituted to ensure standardisation of radiotherapy planning and delivery.The trial has a two-stage non-comparative design. The primary end point of stage I is the proportion of patients meeting predefined normal tissue constraints in the DART group. The primary end point of stage II is late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or worse toxicity aiming to exclude a rate of >20% (80% power and 5% alpha, one sided) in each DART fractionation cohort. Secondary end points include locoregional MIBC control, progression-free survival overall survival and patient-reported outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial is approved by the London-Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee (15/LO/0539). The results when available will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and submission to regulatory authorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02447549; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsCystectomyDose Fractionation, RadiationHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicclinical trialsoncologyradiotherapyurological tumours

Identifiers

PMID33384390
PMCPMC7780718
OpenAlexW3116723721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.