ArticleBMJ open2020
Protocol for tumour-focused dose-escalated adaptive radiotherapy for the radical treatment of bladder cancer in a multicentre phase II randomised controlled trial (RAIDER): radiotherapy planning and delivery guidance.
Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02447549 (A Randomised Phase II Trial of Adaptive Image Guided Standard or Dose Escalated Tumour Boost Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomised Phase II Trial of Adaptive Image Guided Standard or Dose Escalated Tumour Boost Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mapping Local Failure Following Bladder Radiotherapy According to Dose.Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)) · 2022Trial
- A review of clinical trial radiotherapy quality assurance: value, evolution and lessons.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2026Review
- Online adaptive radiation therapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: short-course and high-precision definitive treatment for elderly or medically fragile patients.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Daily artificial intelligence-assisted adaptive small margin radiotherapy during trimodal therapy of muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy.Cancers · 2025Review
- Impact of on-trial IGRT quality assurance in an international adaptive radiotherapy trial for participants with bladder cancer.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2024Article
- CT-Guided Online Adaptive Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Primary Bladder Cancer: A Report of Two Cases.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Prognostic Significance of Histological Subtypes in Patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: An Overview of the Current Literature.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Adaptive radiotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer: a retrospective audit of two bladder filling protocols.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Article
- The impact of advancing the standard of care in radiotherapy on operational treatment resources.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- High-dose radiation-induced immunogenic cell death of bladder cancer cells leads to dendritic cell activation.PloS one · 2024Article
- Article
- Feasibility of tumour-focused adaptive radiotherapy for bladder cancer on the MR-linac.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2022Article
- Recognising the challenges of implementing multi-centre adaptive plan of the day radiotherapy.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2022Article
- A practical approach to bladder preservation with hypofractionated radiotherapy for localised muscle-invasive bladder cancer.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021Review
- Comment on Hunt et al., "Feasibility of magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy for the treatment of bladder cancer".Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021Article
- Imaging and Management of Bladder Cancer.Cancers · 2021Review
- MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy for Bladder Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Review
- Trimodal Therapy Using an MR-guided Radiation Therapy Partial Bladder Tumor Boost in Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
- A Prospective Study of a Resorbable Intravesical Fiducial Marker for Bladder Cancer Radiation Therapy.Advances in radiation oncologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors at 13 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
introductionDaily radiotherapy delivered with radiosensitisation offers patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) comparable outcomes to cystectomy with functional organ preservation. Most recurrences following radiotherapy occur within the bladder. Increasing the delivered radiotherapy dose to the tumour may further improve local control. Developments in image-guided radiotherapy have allowed bladder tumour-focused 'plan of the day' radiotherapy delivery. We aim to test within a randomised multicentre phase II trial whether this technique will enable dose escalation with acceptable rates of toxicity. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with T2-T4aN0M0 unifocal MIBC will be randomised (1:1:2) between standard/control whole bladder single plan radiotherapy, standard dose adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy or dose-escalated adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy (DART). Adaptive tumour-focused radiotherapy will use a library of three plans (small, medium and large) for treatment. A cone beam CT taken prior to each treatment will be used to visualise the anatomy and inform selection of the most appropriate plan for treatment.Two radiotherapy fractionation schedules (32f and 20f) are permitted. A minimum of 120 participants will be randomised in each fractionation cohort (to ensure 57 evaluable DART patients per cohort).A comprehensive radiotherapy quality assurance programme including pretrial and on-trial components is instituted to ensure standardisation of radiotherapy planning and delivery.The trial has a two-stage non-comparative design. The primary end point of stage I is the proportion of patients meeting predefined normal tissue constraints in the DART group. The primary end point of stage II is late Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade 3 or worse toxicity aiming to exclude a rate of >20% (80% power and 5% alpha, one sided) in each DART fractionation cohort. Secondary end points include locoregional MIBC control, progression-free survival overall survival and patient-reported outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This clinical trial is approved by the London-Surrey Borders Research Ethics Committee (15/LO/0539). The results when available will be disseminated via peer-reviewed scientific journals, conference presentations and submission to regulatory authorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02447549; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.