Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384292›Full record

SynthesisAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

Outcome of Flow Diverters with Surface Modifications in Treatment of Cerebral Aneurysms: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Y-L Li, A Roalfe, E Y-L Chu, R Lee, A C O Tsang

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Angiographic and clinical outcomes from 396 aneurysms treated with the pipeline flex embolization device with shield technology.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. The use of FD-HPC in Ruptured and Unruptured Aneurysms, the Italian Dataset (RUAID): Preliminary results on feasibility and safety.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Y-L LiFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (Y.-L.L., E.Y.-L.C., R.L.), Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1722-4188
A RoalfeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (A.R.), University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1622-2639
E Y-L ChuFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (Y.-L.L., E.Y.-L.C., R.L.), Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6831-6966
R LeeFrom the Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology (Y.-L.L., E.Y.-L.C., R.L.), Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2734-0895
A C O TsangDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery (A.C.O.T.), University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China acotsang@hku.hk.ORCID 0000-0003-2758-3253

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewer flow diverters are enhanced with antithrombogenic surface modifications like the Pipeline Embolization Device with Shield Technology and the Derivo Embolization Device and are purported to facilitate deployment and reduce ischemic events. PURPOSE: Our aim was to review the safety and efficacy of surface-modified flow diverters in treating patients with cerebral aneurysms. DATA SOURCES: We used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis covering 3 major data bases and gray literature between 2014 and 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently reviewed human studies of surface-modified flow diverters for eligibility based on predetermined criteria. DATA ANALYSIS: The random effects model and Freeman-Tukey arcsine transformation were used to pool efficacy outcomes (technical success, aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months) and safety outcomes (mortality, morbidity, all ischemia, and serious ischemia). Subgroup analysis was performed to compare outcomes between 2 different flow diverters. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eight single-arm case series involving 911 patients and 1060 aneurysms were included. The median follow-up was 8.24 months. Pooled estimate for technical success was 99.6%, while the aneurysm occlusion at 6 and 12 months were 80.5%, and 85.6%, respectively. Pooled estimates for mortality, morbidity, total ischemia, and serious ischemia rates were 0.7%, 6.0%, 6.7%, and 1.8%, respectively. Most studies were of good quality, and no significant heterogeneity was observed. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include a retrospective, observational design in some studies; heterogeneous and underreported antiplatelet therapy; and potential performance and ecologic bias.

conclusionsEarly-to-midterm safety and efficacy for surface-modified flow diverters appear comparable with older devices, especially for small, unruptured anterior circulation aneurysms. Long-term clinical data are required to further corroborate these results.

Indexed as

Blood Vessel ProsthesisAdultAgedEmbolization, TherapeuticEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID33384292
PMCPMC7872173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.