Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384288›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2021

Postinterventional Assessment after Stent and Flow-Diverter Implantation Using CT: Influence of Spectral Image Reconstructions and Different Device Types.

C Zaeske, T Hickethier, J Borggrefe, L Goertz, R Dettmeyer, M Schlamann, N Abdullayev, C Kabbasch

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 51% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C ZaeskeFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.Z., T.H., J.B., L.G., M.S., N.A., C.K.) charlotte.zaeske@uk-koeln.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3746-8523
T HickethierFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.Z., T.H., J.B., L.G., M.S., N.A., C.K.).ORCID 0000-0001-9303-9470
J BorggrefeFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.Z., T.H., J.B., L.G., M.S., N.A., C.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-2908-7560
L GoertzFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.Z., T.H., J.B., L.G., M.S., N.A., C.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-2620-7611
R DettmeyerInstitute of Forensic Medicine (R.D.), Justus-Liebig-University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1489-3765
M SchlamannFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.Z., T.H., J.B., L.G., M.S., N.A., C.K.).ORCID 0000-0002-7734-611X
N AbdullayevFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.Z., T.H., J.B., L.G., M.S., N.A., C.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-4522-537X
C KabbaschFrom the Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (C.Z., T.H., J.B., L.G., M.S., N.A., C.K.).ORCID 0000-0003-3712-2258
Society of Interventional Radiology · USJustus-Liebig-Universität Gießen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeCTA provides a noninvasive alternative technique to DSA in the follow-up after endovascular aneurysm treatment to evaluate aneurysm occlusion and exclude intraluminal narrowing after stent or flow-diverter implantation; however, assessability may be impeded by stent material artifacts. The objective of this in vitro study was to compare the visual assessability of different conventional stents and flow diverters as well as different reconstructions of dual-layer CT images. MATERIALS AND

methodsFour conventional intracranial stents and 4 flow diverters were implanted in identical aneurysm phantoms. Conventional and monoenergetic images (40, 50, 60, 90, 120, 180 keV) were acquired to evaluate attenuation alteration, visible lumen diameter, and SNR. Image quality was rated subjectively by 2 independent radiologists using a 4-point Likert scale.

resultsLow kiloelectron volt (40-60 keV) monoenergetic reconstructions showed an improved SNR and an improved lumen density ratio compared with high kiloelectron volt reconstructions (90-180 keV) and conventional reconstructions, however without reaching significance compared with the latter. Assessment of the adjacent aneurysm and subjective evaluation was not affected by the imaging technique and stent type. Artifact susceptibility varied with the device used and increased among flow diverters.

conclusionsLow kiloelectron volt reconstructions improved the assessment of the stent lumen in comparison with high kiloelectron volt reconstructions. No significant improvement in image quality could be shown compared with conventional images. For some devices, iodine-specific reconstructions led to severe artifacts and are therefore not recommended. There was no relevant improvement in the assessability of the adjacent aneurysm.

Indexed as

AneurysmArtifactsComputed Tomography AngiographyEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMiddle AgedPhantoms, ImagingStents

Identifiers

PMID33384288
PMCPMC7959427
OpenAlexW3117309321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.