Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384277›Full record

ArticleDisability and health journal2021

Perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities.

Jeanne L Alhusen, Tina Bloom, Kathryn Laughon, Lillian Behan, Rosemary B Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and health journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Pregnancy Decision-Making Among Women With Physical Disabilities: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026
    Article
  6. Ethical wisdom in family planning programming.Frontiers in global women's health · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Experiences of Women With Disabilities in Accessing and Receiving Contraceptive Care.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2021
    Article
  16. "It Would Have Been Nice to Have a Choice": Barriers to Contraceptive Decision-making among Women with Disabilities.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Differences in Contraceptive Method Discontinuation and Contraceptive Method Preferences by Disability Status.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Observational
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeanne L AlhusenUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA. Electronic address: Jla7e@virginia.edu.
Tina BloomUniversity of Missouri Sinclair School of Nursing, S421 Sinclair School of Nursing, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Kathryn LaughonUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Lillian BehanUniversity of Virginia School of Nursing, 225 Jeanette Lancaster Avenue, Charlottesville, VA, 22903, USA.
Rosemary B HughesUniversity of Montana Rural Institute for Inclusive Communities, 52 Corbin Hall, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA.

Funding

Risks and protective factors for unintended pregnancy in women with disabilitiesR21HD086471 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI ALHUSEN, JEANNE L, HUGHES, ROSEMARY B · 2016 to 2017
$469k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD086471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with disabilities have the same rights as women without disabilities to prevent unintended pregnancy, yet little is known about their experiences in accessing family planning methods.

objectiveThis qualitative descriptive study explored perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities.

methodSemi-structured, open-ended interviews were conducted with 31 women with diverse disabilities as part of a larger study investigating risks and facilitators of unintended pregnancy among women with disabilities across the United States.

resultsAnalysis revealed multiple barriers experienced by women with disabilities in accessing effective family planning services needed to prevent unintended pregnancy. Barriers included physical or system barriers, financial limitations, and nonresponsive healthcare providers. Women also identified difficulties in finding appropriate family planning methods, both related and unrelated to disability.

conclusionsThis is the first in-depth exploration of barriers to accessing family planning services and challenges to finding effective family planning options among women with disabilities. The findings underscore the need for targeted interventions, improved provider training, and policy changes to optimize reproductive healthcare, improve access to family planning services, and prevent unintended pregnancy among women of childbearing age with diverse disabilities.

Indexed as

Family Planning ServicesPersons with DisabilitiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansPerceptionPregnancyQualitative ResearchSex EducationUnited StatesDisabilityFamily planningUnintended pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33384277
PMCPMC8219807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.