Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384020›Full record

ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2020

Reflections on key methodological decisions in national burden of disease assessments.

Elena von der Lippe, Brecht Devleesschauwer, Michelle Gourley, Juanita Haagsma, Henk Hilderink, Michael Porst, Annelene Wengler, Grant Wyper, Ian Grant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Measuring Trends in Disability-adjusted Life Years and Life Expectancy in Korea: 2008 to 2021.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The importance of redistribution process of ill-defined deaths in national mortality database.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Elena von der LippeDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany. vonderLippeE@rki.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-1264
Brecht DevleesschauwerDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Michelle GourleyIndigenous Data Analysis and Reporting Unit, Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra, Australia.
Juanita HaagsmaDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Henk HilderinkCentre for Public Health Forecasting, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Michael PorstDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Annelene WenglerDepartment of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Grant WyperPublic Health Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.
Ian GrantPublic Health Scotland, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSummary measures of population health are increasingly used in different public health reporting systems for setting priorities for health care and social service delivery and planning. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) are one of the most commonly used health gap summary measures in the field of public health and have become the key metric for quantifying burden of disease (BoD). BoD methodology is, however, complex and highly data demanding, requiring a substantial capacity to apply, which has led to major disparities across researchers and nations in their resources to perform themselves BoD studies and interpret the soundness of available estimates produced by the Global Burden of Disease Study.

methodsBoD researchers from the COST Action European Burden of Disease network reflect on the most important methodological choices to be made when estimating DALYs. The paper provides an overview of eleven methodological decisions and challenges drawing on the experiences of countries working with BoD methodology in their own national studies. Each of these steps are briefly described and, where appropriate, some examples are provided from different BoD studies across the world.

resultsIn this review article we have identified some of the key methodological choices and challenges that are important to understand when calculating BoD metrics. We have provided examples from different BoD studies that have developed their own strategies in data usage and implementation of statistical methods in the production of BoD estimates.

conclusionsWith the increase in national BoD studies developing their own strategies in data usage and implementation of statistical methods in the production of BoD estimates, there is a pressing need for equitable capacity building on the one hand, and harmonization of methods on the other hand. In response to these issues, several BoD networks have emerged in the European region that bring together expertise across different domains and professional backgrounds. An intensive exchange in the experience of the researchers in the different countries will enable the understanding of the methods and the interpretation of the results from the local authorities who can effectively integrate the BoD estimates in public health policies, intervention and prevention programs.

Indexed as

Burden of disease methodologyDALYsDisability-adjusted life yearsEuropean burden of disease networkPopulation health measuresYears lived with disabilityYears of life lost

Identifiers

PMID33384020
PMCPMC7774238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.