Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33384007›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of psychiatry2021

Harmonizing the Neurobiology and Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

Wayne K Goodman, Eric A Storch, Sameer A Sheth

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of psychiatry, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 14 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 14 pooled it
22.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 14 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 224 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Transdiagnostic mapping of common and specific regional homogeneity alterations across affective and psychotic disorders.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. A Gut-Brain Axis Underlying Succinate-Associated Compulsive-Like Behavior.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wayne K GoodmanMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (all authors) and Department of Neurosurgery (Sheth), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
Eric A StorchMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (all authors) and Department of Neurosurgery (Sheth), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
Sameer A ShethMenninger Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences (all authors) and Department of Neurosurgery (Sheth), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston.
Baylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Measuring Automated Behavioral Observations & Vocal Expressions (ABOVE) while Recording from the BrainUH3NS100549 · NINDS · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GOODMAN, WAYNE K · 2016 to 2022
$7.8M
NINDS NIH HHS UH3 NS100549
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a common, chronic, and oftentimes disabling disorder. The only established first-line treatments for OCD are exposure and response prevention, and serotonin reuptake inhibitor medications (SRIs). However, a subset of patients fails to respond to either modality, and few experience complete remission. Beyond SRI monotherapy, antipsychotic augmentation is the only medication approach for OCD with substantial empirical support. Our incomplete understanding of the neurobiology of OCD has hampered efforts to develop new treatments or enhance extant interventions. This review focuses on several promising areas of research that may help elucidate the pathophysiology of OCD and advance treatment. Multiple studies support a significant genetic contribution to OCD, but pinpointing the specific genetic determinants requires additional investigation. The preferential efficacy of SRIs in OCD has neither led to discovery of serotonergic abnormalities in OCD nor to development of new serotonergic medications for OCD. Several lines of preclinical and clinical evidence suggest dysfunction of the glutamatergic system in OCD, prompting testing of several promising glutamate modulating agents. Functional imaging studies in OCD show consistent evidence for increased activity in brain regions that form a cortico-striato-thalamo-cortical (CSTC) loop. Neuromodulation treatments with either noninvasive devices (e.g., transcranial magnetic stimulation) or invasive procedures (e.g., deep brain stimulation) provide further support for the CSTC model of OCD. A common substrate for various interventions (whether drug, behavioral, or device) may be modulation (at different nodes or connections) of the CSTC circuit that mediates the symptoms of OCD.

Indexed as

BrainCognitive Behavioral TherapyHumansNeural PathwaysObsessive-Compulsive DisorderTreatment OutcomeDeep Brain StimulationExposure Response PreventionGeneticsGenomicsGlutamateNeurobiologyNeurostimulationOCDPANDASSerotoninTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID33384007
PMCPMC8091795
OpenAlexW3115191617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.