Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33383951›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020

End-of-Life Care Preferences of Older Patients with Multimorbidity: A Mixed Methods Systematic Review.

Ana I González-González, Christine Schmucker, Julia Nothacker, Edris Nury, Truc Sophia Dinh, Maria-Sophie Brueckle, Jeanet W Blom, Marjan van den Akker, Kristian Röttger, Odette Wegwarth and 5 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Knowledge of CPR and Code Status Discussions in Traumatically Injured Older Adults: Does Health Literacy Matter?Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Technology to Support Older Adults in Home Palliative Care: A Scoping Review.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Ana I González-GonzálezInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Christine SchmuckerInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1188-3158
Julia NothackerInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
Edris NuryInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
Truc Sophia DinhInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9774-6751
Maria-Sophie BrueckleInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Jeanet W BlomDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marjan van den AkkerInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1022-8637
Kristian RöttgerPatient Representative, Federal Joint Committee "Gemeinsamer Bundseausschuss", 10587 Berlin, Germany.
Odette WegwarthCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck-Institute for Human Development, 14195 Berlin, Germany.
Tammy HoffmannInstitute for Evidence-Based Healthcare, Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia.
Ferdinand M GerlachInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Sharon E StrausDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada.
Joerg J MeerpohlInstitute for Evidence in Medicine (for Cochrane Germany Foundation), Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79110 Freiburg, Germany.
Christiane MuthInstitute of General Practice, Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

German Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01GL1729
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unpredictable disease trajectories make early clarification of end-of-life (EoL) care preferences in older patients with multimorbidity advisable. This mixed methods systematic review synthesizes studies and assesses such preferences. Two independent reviewers screened title/abstracts/full texts in seven databases, extracted data and used the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool to assess risk of bias (RoB). We synthesized findings from 22 studies (3243 patients) narratively and, where possible, quantitatively. Nineteen studies assessed willingness to receive life-sustaining treatments (LSTs), six, the preferred place of care, and eight, preferences regarding shared decision-making processes. When unspecified, 21% of patients in four studies preferred any LST option. In three studies, fewer patients chose LST when faced with death and deteriorating health, and more when treatment promised life extension. In 13 studies, 67% and 48% of patients respectively were willing to receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation, but willingness decreased with deteriorating health. Further, 52% of patients from three studies wished to die at home. Seven studies showed that unless incapacitated, most patients prefer to decide on their EoL care themselves. High non-response rates meant RoB was high in most studies. Knowledge of EoL care preferences of older patients with multimorbidity increases the chance such care will be provided.

Indexed as

elderlyend of life caremultimorbiditypatient centered carepatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID33383951
PMCPMC7795676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.