ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Femur Auxetic Meta-Implants with Tuned Micromotion Distribution.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Additively manufactured controlled porous orthopedic joint replacement designs to reduce bone stress shielding: a systematic review.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Design and Characterization of 3D Printed Auxetic PLA-HA Composite Scaffolds for Biomedical Application.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative Fatigue Analysis of CF-PLA Metamaterial Bone Plates for Orthopaedic Fixation.Polymers · 2026Article
- Experimental Study on the Effect of Humidity on the Mechanical Properties of 3D-Printed Mechanical Metamaterials.Polymers · 2025Article
- Vaginal host response to polycarbonate urethane, an alternative material for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse.Acta biomaterialia · 2024Article
- Auxetic Biomedical Metamaterials for Orthopedic Surgery Applications: A Comprehensive Review.Orthopaedic surgery · 2024Review
- Development of a density-based topology optimization of homogenized lattice structures for individualized hip endoprostheses and validation using micro-FE.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Synergizing Algorithmic Design, Photoclick Chemistry and Multi-Material Volumetric Printing for Accelerating Complex Shape Engineering.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Multi-Scale Topology Optimization of Femoral Stem Structure Subject to Stress Shielding Reduce.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Capability of auxetic femoral stems to reduce stress shielding after total hip arthroplasty.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2023Article
- Remodeling of Architected Mesenchymal Microtissues Generated on Mechanical Metamaterials.3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2022Article
- Additively Manufactured Hierarchical Auxetic Mechanical Metamaterials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Auxetic Metamaterials for Biomedical Devices: Current Situation, Main Challenges, and Research Trends.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Optimal microstructure and mechanical properties of open-cell porous titanium structures produced by selective laser melting.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- Auxetic Structures for Tissue Engineering Scaffolds and Biomedical Devices.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Motility Improvement of Biomimetic Trachea Scaffold via Hybrid 3D-Bioprinting Technology.Polymers · 2021Article
- Energy Absorption and Mechanical Performance of Functionally Graded Soft-Hard Lattice Structures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Idealized 3D Auxetic Mechanical Metamaterial: An Analytical, Numerical, and Experimental Study.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress shielding and micromotions are the most significant problems occurring at the bone-implants interface due to a mismatch of their mechanical properties. Mechanical 3D metamaterials, with their exceptional behaviour and characteristics, can provide an opportunity to solve the mismatch of mechanical properties between the bone and implant. In this study, a new porous femoral hip meta-implant with graded Poisson's ratio distribution was introduced and its results were compared to three other femoral hip implants (one solid implant, and two porous meta-implants, one with positive and the other with a negative distribution of Poisson's ratio) in terms of stress and micromotion distributions. For this aim, first, a well-known auxetic 3D re-entrant structure was studied analytically, and precise closed-form analytical relationships for its elastic modulus and Poisson's ratio were derived. The results of the analytical solution for mechanical properties of the 3D re-entrant structure presented great improvements in comparison to previous analytical studies on the structure. Moreover, the implementation of the re-entrant structure in the hip implant provided very smooth results for stress and strain distributions in the lattice meta-implants and could solve the stress shielding problem which occurred in the solid implant. The lattice meta-implant based on the graded unit cell distribution presented smoother stress-strain distribution in comparison with the other lattice meta-implants. Moreover, the graded lattice meta-implant gave minimum areas of local stress and local strain concentration at the contact region of the implants with the internal bone surfaces. Among all the cases, the graded meta-implant also gave micromotion levels which are the closest to values reported to be desirable for bone growth (40 µm).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.