Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33383844›Full record

ArticleCancers2020

Prognostic Impact of Pedicle Clamping during Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases.

Tobias S Schiergens, Moritz Drefs, Maximilian Dörsch, Florian Kühn, Markus Albertsmeier, Hanno Niess, Markus B Schoenberg, Matthias Assenmacher, Helmut Küchenhoff, Wolfgang E Thasler and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tobias S SchiergensDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Moritz DrefsDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Maximilian DörschDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Florian KühnDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Markus AlbertsmeierDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5028-5062
Hanno NiessDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Markus B SchoenbergDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Matthias AssenmacherDepartment of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Akademiestr 1, D-80799 Munich, Germany.
Helmut KüchenhoffDepartment of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Akademiestr 1, D-80799 Munich, Germany.
Wolfgang E ThaslerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Markus O GubaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Martin K AngeleDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Markus RentschDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Jens WernerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Joachim AndrassyDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Marchioninistr 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pedicle clamping (PC) during liver resection for colorectal metastases (CRLM) is used to reduce blood loss and allogeneic blood transfusion (ABT). The effect on long-term oncologic outcomes is still under debate. A retrospective analysis of the impact of PC on ABT-demand regarding overall (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in 336 patients undergoing curative resection for CRLM was carried out. Survival analysis was performed by both univariate and multivariate methods and propensity-score (PS) matching. PC was employed in 75 patients (22%). No increased postoperative morbidity was monitored. While the overall ABT-rate was comparable (35% vs. 37%,

Indexed as

blood losscolorectal liver metastasispedicle clampingPringletransfusion

Identifiers

PMID33383844
PMCPMC7795154
OpenAlexW3113939754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.