Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33383831›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Active and Passive Electro-Optical Sensors for Health Assessment in Food Crops.

Thomas Fahey, Hai Pham, Alessandro Gardi, Roberto Sabatini, Dario Stefanelli, Ian Goodwin, David William Lamb

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas FaheySchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Hai PhamSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.
Alessandro GardiSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4995-4166
Roberto SabatiniSchool of Engineering, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3399-2291
Dario StefanelliFood Agility CRC Ltd., 81 Broadway, Melbourne, NSW 2007, Australia.
Ian GoodwinFood Agility CRC Ltd., 81 Broadway, Melbourne, NSW 2007, Australia.
David William LambFood Agility CRC Ltd., 81 Broadway, Melbourne, NSW 2007, Australia.
RMIT University · AUAgriculture Victoria · AU

Funding

Food Agility CRC FA042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In agriculture, early detection of plant stresses is advantageous in preventing crop yield losses. Remote sensors are increasingly being utilized for crop health monitoring, offering non-destructive, spatialized detection and the quantification of plant diseases at various levels of measurement. Advances in sensor technologies have promoted the development of novel techniques for precision agriculture. As in situ techniques are surpassed by multispectral imaging, refinement of hyperspectral imaging and the promising emergence of light detection and ranging (LIDAR), remote sensing will define the future of biotic and abiotic plant stress detection, crop yield estimation and product quality. The added value of LIDAR-based systems stems from their greater flexibility in capturing data, high rate of data delivery and suitability for a high level of automation while overcoming the shortcomings of passive systems limited by atmospheric conditions, changes in light, viewing angle and canopy structure. In particular, a multi-sensor systems approach and associated data fusion techniques (i.e., blending LIDAR with existing electro-optical sensors) offer increased accuracy in plant disease detection by focusing on traditional optimal estimation and the adoption of artificial intelligence techniques for spatially and temporally distributed big data. When applied across different platforms (handheld, ground-based, airborne, ground/aerial robotic vehicles or satellites), these electro-optical sensors offer new avenues to predict and react to plant stress and disease. This review examines the key sensor characteristics, platform integration options and data analysis techniques recently proposed in the field of precision agriculture and highlights the key challenges and benefits of each concept towards informing future research in this very important and rapidly growing field.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEnvironmental MonitoringRemote Sensing TechnologyAgricultureCrops, AgriculturalPlant Diseasesagricultureartificial intelligencedisease detectionelectro-opticsfluorescencefood cropheath assessmenthyperspectrallaserLIDARmachine learningmultispectralprecision agricultureremote sensingsensorspectroscopy

Identifiers

PMID33383831
PMCPMC7795220
OpenAlexW3114721420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.