Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33383756›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Assessing the Respiratory Effects of Air Pollution from Biomass Cookstoves on Pregnant Women in Rural India.

Raj Parikh, Sowmya R Rao, Rakesh Kukde, George T O'Connor, Archana Patel, Patricia L Hibberd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Raj ParikhDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center 72 East Concord Street, R304, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Sowmya R RaoDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Rakesh KukdeLata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur 440002, India.
George T O'ConnorDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston University Medical Center 72 East Concord Street, R304, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Archana PatelLata Medical Research Foundation, Nagpur 440002, India.
Patricia L HibberdDepartment of Global Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02118, USA.
Boston University · USLata Medical Research Foundation · INBoston Medical Center · US

Funding

Boston University/Lata Medical Research Foundation Global Network for Women's Children's Health Research UnitUG1HD078439 · NICHD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI Patricia L Hibberd · 2018 to 2026
$5.5M
NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD078439
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn India, biomass fuel is burned in many homes under inefficient conditions, leading to a complex milieu of particulate matter and environmental toxins known as household air pollution (HAP). Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable as they and their fetus may suffer from adverse consequences of HAP. Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a noninvasive, underutilized tool that can serve as a surrogate for airway inflammation. We evaluated the prevalence of respiratory illness, using pulmonary questionnaires and FeNO measurements, among pregnant women in rural India who utilize biomass fuel as a source of energy within their home.

methodsWe prospectively studied 60 pregnant women in their 1st and 2nd trimester residing in villages near Nagpur, Central India. We measured FeNO levels in parts per billion (ppb), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-C) scores, and the Modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) Dyspnea Scale. We evaluated the difference in the outcome distributions between women using biomass fuels and those using liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) using two-tailed t-tests.

resultsSixty-five subjects (32 in Biomass households; 28 in LPG households; 5 unable to complete) were enrolled in the study. Age, education level, and second-hand smoke exposure were comparable between both groups. FeNO levels were higher in the Biomass vs. LPG group (25.4 ppb vs. 8.6 ppb;

conclusionIncreased FeNO levels and higher dyspnea scores in biomass-fuel-exposed subjects confirm the adverse respiratory effects of this exposure during pregnancy. More so, FeNO may be a useful, noninvasive biomarker of inflammation that can help better understand the physiologic effects of biomass smoke on pregnant women. In the future, larger studies are needed to characterize the utility of FeNO in a population exposed to HAP.

Indexed as

Air PollutionAir Pollution, IndoorPregnant PeoplePremature BirthAdultBiomassCookingDyspneaFemaleHumansIndiaInflammationNitric OxidePetroleumPregnancyRespiratory Tract DiseasesNitric OxidePetroleumbiomass fuelCentral Indiafractional exhaled nitric oxidehousehold air pollutionindoor air pollution

Identifiers

PMID33383756
PMCPMC7795669
OpenAlexW3114056907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.