Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33383743›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2020

ApoE-Targeting Increases the Transfer of Solid Lipid Nanoparticles with Donepezil Cargo across a Culture Model of the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Gizem Rüya Topal, Mária Mészáros, Gergő Porkoláb, Anikó Szecskó, Tamás Ferenc Polgár, László Siklós, Mária A Deli, Szilvia Veszelka, Asuman Bozkir

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. COG133 peptide-conjugated lipid nanoparticles sensitize medulloblastoma to radiation therapy in mice.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gizem Rüya TopalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Yenimahalle, Ankara 06560, Turkey.
Mária MészárosInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Gergő PorkolábInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-2495-0479
Anikó SzecskóInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Tamás Ferenc PolgárInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
László SiklósInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Mária A DeliInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6084-6524
Szilvia VeszelkaInstitute of Biophysics, Biological Research Centre, Temesvári krt. 62, H-6726 Szeged, Hungary.
Asuman BozkirDepartment of Pharmaceutical Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Ankara University, Yenimahalle, Ankara 06560, Turkey.
HUN-REN Szegedi Biológiai Kutatóközpont · HUAnkara University · TR

Funding

IMPROVING THE RISK ASSESSMENT IN EPIDEMIOLOGYF06TW002214 · FIC · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI MOHAMMED, HUSSNI O · 1998 to 1998
–
Ankara University 18L0237011Hungarian Academy of Sciences Premium-2019-469Hungarian Ministry of Innovation and Technology, Szeged Scientists Academy FEIF/433-4/2020-ITM_SZERZJános Bolyai Research Fellowship of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences BO/00793/18/8National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary GINOP-2.2.1-15-2016-00007National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary GINOP-2.3.2-15-2016-00060National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary NNE-29617New National Excellence Program UNKP-20-3-SZTE-482Scientific and Technical Research Council of Turkey TUBITAK- 2214 International Doctoral Research Fellowship Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pharmacological treatment of central nervous system (CNS) disorders is difficult, because the blood-brain barrier (BBB) restricts the penetration of many drugs into the brain. To solve this unmet therapeutic need, nanosized drug carriers are the focus of research efforts to develop drug delivery systems for the CNS. For the successful delivery of nanoparticles (NPs) to the brain, targeting ligands on their surface is necessary. Our research aim was to design a nanoscale drug delivery system for a more efficient transfer of donepezil, an anticholinergic drug in the therapy of Alzheimer's disease across the BBB. Rhodamine B-labeled solid lipid nanoparticles with donepezil cargo were prepared and targeted with apolipoprotein E (ApoE), a ligand of BBB receptors. Nanoparticles were characterized by measurement of size, polydispersity index, zeta potential, thermal analysis, Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, in vitro release, and stability. Cytotoxicity of nanoparticles were investigated by metabolic assay and impedance-based cell analysis. ApoE-targeting increased the uptake of lipid nanoparticles in cultured brain endothelial cells and neurons. Furthermore, the permeability of ApoE-targeted nanoparticles across a co-culture model of the BBB was also elevated. Our data indicate that ApoE, which binds BBB receptors, can potentially be exploited for successful CNS targeting of solid lipid nanoparticles.

Indexed as

ApoEblood–brain barrierdonepezildrug delivery to brainsolid lipid nanoparticletargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

PMID33383743
PMCPMC7824445
OpenAlexW3115389925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.