ArticlePloS one2020
Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
29 citing papers in PubMed.
- Balancing harm prevention and liberty preservation when implementing financial risk assessments for gambling in the United Kingdom: Insights from open banking data.Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2026Article
- DNAm landscape up to 4 months post SARS-CoV-2 infection: insights from four population-based cohorts.Clinical epigenetics · 2026Article
- Are Semantic Representations Stable? A Bayesian Framework Applied to the Study of Quantifier Meaning.Computational brain & behavior · 2026Article
- Creating a responsible authorship culture in science: Anchoring authorship practices in principles of transparency, credit, and accountability.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- The tension between big team science and colonial power dynamics.Nature human behaviour · 2026Article
- Music Ensemble: a large dataset on musicianship, cognition, and personality in musicians and nonmusicians.Scientific data · 2026Article
- Dragon Kill Points: applying a transparent working template to relieve authorship stress.BMC biology · 2026Review
- Advancing Equity for Global Health Author Teams within the Publishing Ecosystem.Annals of global health · 2026Article
- Group authorship, an excellent opportunity laced with ethical, legal and technical challenges.Accountability in research · 2025Article
- Crediting non-author contributors in scientific publishing.Nature human behaviour · 2025Article
- The fNIRS glossary project: a consensus-based resource for functional near-infrared spectroscopy terminology.Neurophotonics · 2025Article
- Error tight: Exercises for lab groups to prevent research mistakes.Psychological methods · 2025Article
- Experience-driven suppression of irrelevant distractor locations is context dependent.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Refining Bayesian hierarchical MPT modeling: Integrating prior knowledge and ordinal expectations.Behavior research methods · 2024Article
- Engineered nanoparticles promote cardiac tropism of AAV vectors.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2024Article
- "This behavior strikes us as ideal": assessment and anticipations of Huisman (2022).Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Review
- Catalyzing communities of research rigour champions.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for starting FAIR discussions in your community.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- The CalculAuthor: determining authorship using a simple-to-use, fair, objective, and transparent process.BMC research notes · 2023Article
- Lack of Sample Diversity in Research on Adolescent Depression and Social Media Use: A Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scholars traditionally receive career credit for a paper based on where in the author list they appear, but position in an author list often carries little information about what the contribution of each researcher was. "Contributorship" refers to a movement to formally document the nature of each researcher's contribution to a project. We discuss the emerging CRediT standard for documenting contributions and describe a web-based app and R package called tenzing that is designed to facilitate its use. tenzing can make it easier for researchers on a project to plan and record their planned contributions and to document those contributions in a journal article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.