Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33382859›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health: An international study.

Andrew T Gloster, Demetris Lamnisos, Jelena Lubenko, Giovambattista Presti, Valeria Squatrito, Marios Constantinou, Christiana Nicolaou, Savvas Papacostas, Gökçen Aydın, Yuen Yu Chong and 26 more

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 270 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
270citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

270 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. A Systematic Review of Economic Evaluations of COVID-19 Interventions: Considerations of Non-Health Impacts and Distributional Issues.Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vulnerability and protective factors for PTSD in the academic community during the pandemic.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

210 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Andrew T GlosterDivision of Clinical Psychology & Intervention Science, Department of Psychology, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3751-0878
Demetris LamnisosDepartment of Health Sciences, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Jelena LubenkoPsychological Laboratory, Faculty of Public Health and Social Welfare, Riga Stradiņš University, Riga, Latvia.ORCID 0000-0002-1814-1325
Giovambattista PrestiKore University Behavioral Lab (KUBeLab), Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0891-4558
Valeria SquatritoKore University Behavioral Lab (KUBeLab), Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0796-2187
Marios ConstantinouDepartment of Social Sciences, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Nicosia, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Christiana NicolaouDepartment of Nursing, Cyprus University of Technology, Limassol, Cyprus.
Savvas PapacostasCyprus Institute of Neurology and Genetics, Nicosia, Cyprus.
Gökçen AydınDepartment of Psychological Counseling and Guidance, Faculty of Education, Hasan Kalyoncu University, Gaziantep, Turkey.
Yuen Yu ChongThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-2051
Wai Tong ChienThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Ho Yu ChengThe Nethersole School of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Francisco J RuizDepartment of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotà, Columbia.
Maria B Garcia-MartinFaculty of Psychology, University of La Sabana, Chía, Columbia.
Diana P Obando-PosadaFaculty of Psychology, University of La Sabana, Chía, Columbia.
Miguel A Segura-VargasDepartment of Psychology, Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz, Bogotà, Columbia.
Vasilis S VasiliouSchool of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Louise McHughSchool of Psychology, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Stefan HöferMedical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Adriana BabanDepartment of Psychology, Babeş-Bolyai University (UBB), Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
David Dias NetoInstituto Superior de Psicologia Aplicada (ISPA), Instituto Universitário; APPsyCI-Applied Psychology Research Center Capabilities & Inclusion, Lisboa, Portugal.
Ana Nunes da SilvaFaculdade de Psicologia, Alameda da Universidade, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal.
Jean-Louis MonestèsLIP/PC2S, Université Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
Javier Alvarez-GalvezDepartment of Biomedicine, Biotechnology and Public Health, University of Cadiz, Cadiz, Spain.
Marisa Paez-BlarrinaInstituto ACT, Madrid, Spain.
Francisco MontesinosDepartment of Psychology, European University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Sonsoles Valdivia-SalasDepartment of Psychology and Sociology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.
Dorottya OriVadaskert Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Hospital, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-0878-165X
Bartosz KleszczPrivate Pratice, Poland.
Raimo LappalainenDepartment of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Iva IvanovićClinic for Psychiatry, Clinical Center of Montenegro, Podgorica, Montenegro.
David GosarLjubljana University Medical Centre, Ljubljana, Slovania.ORCID 0000-0002-5289-3459
Frederick DionneDépartement de Psychologie, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Canada.
Rhonda M MerwinDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Angelos P KassianosDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-6428-2623
Maria KareklaDepartment of Psychology, University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus.ORCID 0000-0001-7021-7908

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic triggered vast governmental lockdowns. The impact of these lockdowns on mental health is inadequately understood. On the one hand such drastic changes in daily routines could be detrimental to mental health. On the other hand, it might not be experienced negatively, especially because the entire population was affected.

methodsThe aim of this study was to determine mental health outcomes during pandemic induced lockdowns and to examine known predictors of mental health outcomes. We therefore surveyed n = 9,565 people from 78 countries and 18 languages. Outcomes assessed were stress, depression, affect, and wellbeing. Predictors included country, sociodemographic factors, lockdown characteristics, social factors, and psychological factors.

resultsResults indicated that on average about 10% of the sample was languishing from low levels of mental health and about 50% had only moderate mental health. Importantly, three consistent predictors of mental health emerged: social support, education level, and psychologically flexible (vs. rigid) responding. Poorer outcomes were most strongly predicted by a worsening of finances and not having access to basic supplies.

conclusionsThese results suggest that on whole, respondents were moderately mentally healthy at the time of a population-wide lockdown. The highest level of mental health difficulties were found in approximately 10% of the population. Findings suggest that public health initiatives should target people without social support and those whose finances worsen as a result of the lockdown. Interventions that promote psychological flexibility may mitigate the impact of the pandemic.

Indexed as

Mental HealthPandemicsSARS-CoV-2AdultCOVID-19Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID33382859
PMCPMC7774914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.