Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33382830›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2020

A direct RT-qPCR approach to test large numbers of individuals for SARS-CoV-2.

Tomislav Maricic, Olaf Nickel, Ayinuer Aximu-Petri, Elena Essel, Marie Gansauge, Philipp Kanis, Dominik Macak, Julia Richter, Stephan Riesenberg, Lukas Bokelmann and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Performance of saline and water gargling for SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcriptase PCR testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Clinical validation of the isothermal RT-LAMP test for rapid diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud · 2022
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. The Comparative Analysis of Two RT-qPCR Kits for Detecting SARS-CoV-2 Reveals a Higher Risk of False-Negative Diagnosis in Samples with High Quantification Cycles for Viral and Internal Genes.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tomislav MaricicMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3267-0474
Olaf NickelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany.
Ayinuer Aximu-PetriMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Elena EsselMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Marie GansaugeMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Philipp KanisMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Dominik MacakMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Julia RichterMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Stephan RiesenbergMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Lukas BokelmannMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Hugo ZebergMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Matthias MeyerMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Stephan BorteDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Hospital St. Georg, Leipzig, Germany.
Svante PääboMax Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany.
Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology · DEKarolinska Institutet · SEKarolinska University Hospital · SEKlinikum St. Georg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 causes substantial morbidity and mortality in elderly and immunocompromised individuals, particularly in retirement homes, where transmission from asymptomatic staff and visitors may introduce the infection. Here we present a cheap and fast screening method based on direct RT-qPCR to detect SARS-CoV-2 in single or pooled gargle lavages ("mouthwashes"). This method detects individuals with large viral loads (Ct≤29) and we use it to test all staff at a nursing home daily over a period of three weeks in order to reduce the risk that the infection penetrates the facility. This or similar approaches can be implemented to protect hospitals, nursing homes and other institutions in this and future viral epidemics.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingMass ScreeningReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionHumansSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33382830
PMCPMC7774962
OpenAlexW3037102352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.