ArticlePloS one2020
On the molecular relationship between Hounsfield Unit (HU), mass density, and electron density in computed tomography (CT).
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Feasibility of electron density map derived from unenhanced dual-energy CT for detecting peritonsillar abscess.Neuroradiology · 2026Article
- Optimal energy level of virtual monoenergetic images for iron detectability in dual-energy CT: a Phantom study.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
- Bone Fusion in the Cervical Spine: Where Are We Now?Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Noisy probing dose facilitated dose prediction for pencil beam scanning proton therapy: Physics enhances generalizability.Medical physics · 2026Article
- A Phase 0 Imaging Trial of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026Article
- Saturation of space weathering in shaping lunar regolith particle morphology.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Feasibility Study of Using Kv-Cone Beam CT Images as Patient Specific Quality Assurance Tool.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Impact of range uncertainties for intensity-modulated mixed electron-photon radiation therapy.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Improved visualization of electron-density dual-energy computed tomography for lumbar disc disease over the standard gray-scale type and virtual noncalcium imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- The Impact of Sarcopenic Obesity on Weight Loss Outcomes and Recurrent Weight Gain Following Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025Article
- Electron density dual-energy CT can improve the detection of lumbar disc herniation with higher image quality than standard and virtual non-calcium images.European radiology · 2024Article
- RDAG U-Net: An Advanced AI Model for Efficient and Accurate CT Scan Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 Pneumonia Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- MRI-only based material mass density and relative stopping power estimation via deep learning for proton therapy: a preliminary study.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- HU-based material conversion for BNCT accurate dose estimation.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Validation of an MR-based multimodal method for molecular composition and proton stopping power ratio determination usingPhysics in medicine and biology · 2023Article
- Article
- Clinical use of positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning - Medical physics considerations.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2023Review
- Article
- Image-guided intratumoral immunotherapy: Developing a clinically practical technology.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate determination of physical/mass and electron densities are critical to accurate spatial and dosimetric delivery of radiotherapy for photon and charged particles. In this manuscript, the biology, chemistry, and physics that underly the relationship between computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield Unit (HU), mass density, and electron density was explored. In standard radiation physics practice, quantities such as mass and electron density are typically calculated based off a single kilovoltage CT (kVCT) scan assuming a one-to-one relationship between HU and density. It is shown that, in absence of mass density assumptions on tissues, the relationship between HU and density is not one-to-one with uncertainties as large as 7%. To mitigate this uncertainty, a novel multi-dimensional theoretical approach is defined between molecular (water, lipid, protein, and mineral) composition, HU, mass density, and electron density. Empirical parameters defining this relationship are x-ray beam energy/spectrum dependent and, in this study, two methods are proposed to solve for them including through a tissue mimicking phantom calibration process. As a proof of concept, this methodology was implemented in a separate in-house created tissue mimicking phantom and it is shown that sub 1% accuracy is possible for both mass and electron density. As molecular composition is not always known, the sensitivity of this model to uncertainties in molecular composition was investigated and it was found that, for soft tissue, sub 1% accuracy is achievable assuming nominal organ/tissue compositions. For boney tissues, the uncertainty in mineral content may lead to larger errors in mass and electron density compared with soft tissue. In this manuscript, a novel methodology to directly determine mass and electron density based off CT HU and knowledge of molecular compositions is presented. If used in conjunction with a methodology to determine molecular compositions, mass and electron density can be accurately calculated from CT HU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.