Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33382698›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

An unbiased template of the Drosophila brain and ventral nerve cord.

John A Bogovic, Hideo Otsuna, Larissa Heinrich, Masayoshi Ito, Jennifer Jeter, Geoffrey Meissner, Aljoscha Nern, Jennifer Colonell, Oz Malkesman, Kei Ito and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 76 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
76citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

76 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sexual dimorphism in the complete connectome of thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Neural connectivity of a computational map for fly flight control.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

16 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

John A BogovicJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4829-9457
Hideo OtsunaJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2107-8881
Larissa HeinrichJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Masayoshi ItoJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Jennifer JeterJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Geoffrey MeissnerJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0369-9788
Aljoscha NernJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Jennifer ColonellJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Oz MalkesmanJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.
Kei ItoInstitute of Zoology, University of Cologne, Germany.
Stephan SaalfeldJanelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-4106-1761

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster is an important model organism for neuroscience with a wide array of genetic tools that enable the mapping of individual neurons and neural subtypes. Brain templates are essential for comparative biological studies because they enable analyzing many individuals in a common reference space. Several central brain templates exist for Drosophila, but every one is either biased, uses sub-optimal tissue preparation, is imaged at low resolution, or does not account for artifacts. No publicly available Drosophila ventral nerve cord template currently exists. In this work, we created high-resolution templates of the Drosophila brain and ventral nerve cord using the best-available technologies for imaging, artifact correction, stitching, and template construction using groupwise registration. We evaluated our central brain template against the four most competitive, publicly available brain templates and demonstrate that ours enables more accurate registration with fewer local deformations in shorter time.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDrosophila melanogasterFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMaleMicroscopy, ConfocalMicroscopy, ElectronNerve TissueNeurons

Identifiers

PMID33382698
PMCPMC7774840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.