Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33382582›Full record

ArticleChemical research in toxicology2021

Development of a Web-Based Toolbox to Support Quantitative In-Vitro-to-In-Vivo Extrapolations (QIVIVE) within Nonanimal Testing Strategies.

Ans Punt, Nicole Pinckaers, Ad Peijnenburg, Jochem Louisse

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical research in toxicology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Incorporating new approach methods (NAMs) data in dose-response assessments: The future is now!Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews · 2025
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physiologically based Kinetic Modeling-Facilitated QuantitativeJournal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2024
    Article
  15. Advancing Toxicity Predictions: A Review onEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. IntegratingEnvironmental science & technology · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ans PuntWageningen Food Safety Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2056-4634
Nicole PinckaersWageningen Food Safety Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Ad PeijnenburgWageningen Food Safety Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Jochem LouisseWageningen Food Safety Research, Akkermaalsbos 2, 6708 WB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Wageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The goal of the present study was to develop an online web-based toolbox that contains generic physiologically based kinetic (PBK) models for rats and humans, including underlying calculation tools to predict plasma protein binding and tissue:plasma distribution, to be used for quantitative in-vitro-to-in-vivo extrapolations (QIVIVE). The PBK models within the toolbox allow first estimations of internal plasma and tissue concentrations of chemicals to be made, based on the logP and p

Indexed as

High-Throughput Screening AssaysInternetToxicity TestsAnimalsFood AdditivesHumansKineticsFood Additives

Identifiers

PMID33382582
PMCPMC7887804
OpenAlexW3118021898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.