ArticleZoonoses and public health2021
Towards One Health clinical management of zoonoses: A parallel survey of Australian general medical practitioners and veterinarians.
Article in Zoonoses and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integration of One Health activities into professional student education: successes, challenges, and considerations.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Self-reported knowledge, attitudes and concerns about zoonoses among general practitioners in the Netherlands.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- Can the epidemiology of zoonotic disease be studied in routine health records? A feasibility study of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Article
- The Challenge of Lyssavirus Infections in Domestic and Other Animals: A Mix of Virological Confusion, Consternation, Chagrin, and Curiosity.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Anisakidae and Anisakidosis: A Public Health Perspective.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Zoonotic infections in UK and Irish veterinary students: a cross-sectional survey.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Perception of Ticks and Tick-Borne Diseases Worldwide.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Telehealth as a Component of One Health: a Position Paper.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2023Review
- A Case Study of European Collaboration between the Veterinary and Human Field for the Development of RSV Vaccines.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Data analysis of zoonoses notifications in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations in Australia 1996-2021: implications for One Health.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- A vision of a One Health system for Australia: on the need to rethink our health system.The Medical journal of Australia · 2022Article
- Pet Owners' Perceptions of COVID-19, Zoonotic Disease, and Veterinary Medicine: The Impact of Demographic Characteristics.Veterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Zoonoses and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population: A One Health scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2022Article
- A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge on Ownership, Zoonoses and Practices among Pet Owners in Northern Portugal.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Strategic planning, components and evolution in zoonotic diseases frameworks: one health approach and public health ethics.Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene · 2021Review
- Global health security must embrace a One Health approach: Contributions and experiences of veterinarians during the COVID-19 response in Australia.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021Article
- Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Rabies among Human and Animal Health Professionals in Senegal.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Towards One Health clinical management of zoonoses: A parallel survey of Australian general medical practitioners and veterinarians.Zoonoses and public health · 2021Article
- Advances in Microbial Diagnostics: Machine Learning and Nanotechnology for Zoonotic Disease Control.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
General medical practitioners (GPs) and veterinarians have different but complementary knowledge and skills, with potential to enhance clinical management of zoonoses in human and animal patients through taking a One Health approach that promotes cross-professional collaboration. Ability and willingness to engage within this framework is contingent on knowledge of endemic zoonoses and an understanding of the diversity of professional roles; however, previous research suggests that this is lacking. A unique parallel survey of Australian GPs and veterinarians was implemented to ascertain clinician experience, concern, confidence and current practices regarding zoonoses management as well as willingness to engage in cross-professional collaboration where it is beneficial to overall health outcomes. Responses from 528 GPs and 605 veterinarians were analysed. Veterinarians in clinical practice were found to more frequently diagnose zoonoses; have greater concern about zoonoses; be more confident in diagnosing, managing and giving advice about the prevention of zoonoses; more likely to give advice about managing the risk of zoonoses; and more likely to initiate cross-professional referral compared to GPs (p < .001 in all areas, adjusted for other factors). The findings of this study indicate a need for change in both clinical and continuing professional education, especially for GPs, in order to better equip them in the area of zoonoses management. Exploration of pathways to encourage and facilitate cross-professional referral and collaboration will further improve clinical outcomes for both human and animal patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.