Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381996›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2021

Understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on well-being and virtual care for people living with dementia and care partners living in the community.

Pamela Roach, Angela Zwiers, Emily Cox, Karyn Fischer, Anna Charlton, Colin B Josephson, Scott B Patten, Dallas Seitz, Zahinoor Ismail, Eric E Smith

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 95 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pamela RoachDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Calgary; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Canada; O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-9309
Angela ZwiersDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada.
Emily CoxDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada.
Karyn FischerDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada.
Anna CharltonDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada.
Colin B JosephsonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Canada; O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada; Centre for Health Informatics, University of Calgary, Canada.
Scott B PattenDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada; Cuthbertson & Fischer Chair in Pediatric Mental Health, University of Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9871-4041
Dallas SeitzDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Canada; O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Canada.
Zahinoor IsmailDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Canada; Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Canada; O'Brien Institute of Public Health, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5529-3731
Eric E SmithHotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Canada; Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated public health measures that have impacted the provision of care for people living with dementia and their families. Additionally, the isolation that results from social distancing may be harming well-being for families as formal and informal supports become less accessible. For those living with dementia and experiencing agitation, social distancing may be even harder to maintain, or social distancing could potentially aggravate dementia-related neuropsychiatric symptoms. To understand the lived experience of social and physical distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, we remotely interviewed 21 participants who normally attend a dementia specialty clinic in Calgary, Alberta, during a period where essential businesses were closed and health care had abruptly transitioned to telemedicine. A reflexive thematic analysis was used to analyze the interview and field note data. The impacts of the public health measures in response to the pandemic emerged through iterative analysis in three main categories of experience: (1) personal, (2) health services, and (3) health status (of both persons living with dementia and care partner). Isolation and mental health needs emerged as important impacts to family experiences. This in-depth understanding of the needs and experiences of the pandemic for people living with dementia suggests that innovative means are urgently needed to facilitate provision of remote medicine and also social interaction and integration.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19DementiaPandemicsCanadaHumansMental HealthTelemedicinecommunityCOVID-19dementialived experiencevirtual carewell-being

Identifiers

PMID33381996
PMCPMC7952494
OpenAlexW3113998625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.