Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381939›Full record

ArticleYonsei medical journal2021

Wingspan Stenting for Symptomatic Severe In-Stent Stenosis of a Closed-Cell Stent after Stent-Assisted Coiling of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm.

Jang Hoon Kim, Joonho Chung

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jang Hoon KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5284-7973
Joonho ChungDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ns.joonho.chung@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2745-446X
Yonsei University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We report the 3-year follow-up result of Wingspan intracranial stenting for symptomatic severe in-stent stenosis after stent-assisted coiling (SAC) for a ruptured left distal internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm. A middle-aged male patient visited our hospital for in-stent stenosis of a stent that was placed to treat a ruptured ICA aneurysm. Routine follow-up cerebral angiography, 1 year after SAC, showed in-stent stenosis around the distal markers of the inserted stent at the left M1 proximal segment. Six months later, he developed right dysesthesia. We performed intracranial stenting with Wingspan stent for the in-stent stenosis. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography performed 1 year after the Wingspan stenting showed good patency of the ICA and middle cerebral artery flow without evidence of restenosis. At 3-year follow-up, magnetic resonance angiography showed sufficient middle cerebral artery flow although the stenting segment could not be visualized clearly. Wingspan stenting might be a feasible option in patients with iatrogenic intracranial stenosis resulting from in-stent stenosis who experience the progression of intracranial stenosis with manifestation of neurological symptoms despite dual anti-platelet therapy.

Indexed as

StentsAgedAneurysm, RupturedAngiography, Digital SubtractionCerebral AngiographyConstriction, PathologicFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIntracranial AneurysmMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeIntracranial aneurysmstenosisstent

Identifiers

PMID33381939
PMCPMC7820447
OpenAlexW3116205350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.