ArticleYonsei medical journal2021
Wingspan Stenting for Symptomatic Severe In-Stent Stenosis of a Closed-Cell Stent after Stent-Assisted Coiling of a Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysm.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We report the 3-year follow-up result of Wingspan intracranial stenting for symptomatic severe in-stent stenosis after stent-assisted coiling (SAC) for a ruptured left distal internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm. A middle-aged male patient visited our hospital for in-stent stenosis of a stent that was placed to treat a ruptured ICA aneurysm. Routine follow-up cerebral angiography, 1 year after SAC, showed in-stent stenosis around the distal markers of the inserted stent at the left M1 proximal segment. Six months later, he developed right dysesthesia. We performed intracranial stenting with Wingspan stent for the in-stent stenosis. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography performed 1 year after the Wingspan stenting showed good patency of the ICA and middle cerebral artery flow without evidence of restenosis. At 3-year follow-up, magnetic resonance angiography showed sufficient middle cerebral artery flow although the stenting segment could not be visualized clearly. Wingspan stenting might be a feasible option in patients with iatrogenic intracranial stenosis resulting from in-stent stenosis who experience the progression of intracranial stenosis with manifestation of neurological symptoms despite dual anti-platelet therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.