Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381824›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2020

New mixture models for decoy-free false discovery rate estimation in mass spectrometry proteomics.

Yisu Peng, Shantanu Jain, Yong Fuga Li, Michal Greguš, Alexander R Ivanov, Olga Vitek, Predrag Radivojac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yisu PengKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Shantanu JainKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Yong Fuga LiIllumina Inc., San Diego, CA 92122, USA.
Michal GregušDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Alexander R IvanovDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Olga VitekKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Predrag RadivojacKhoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

Funding

Effect of methodological and biological variability on molecular profiling of extracellular vesicles in cancer detectionR01CA218500 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GHIRAN, IONITA CALIN, IVANOV, ALEXANDER R. · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Robust ultra-high sensitivity proteomic technologies for limited samplesR35GM136421 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Alexander R. Ivanov · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
Computational approaches to protein identification and quantification using MS/MSR01GM103725 · NIGMS · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI RADIVOJAC, PREDRAG · 2012 to 2015
$1.7M
Deep Proteomic Profiling of Rare CellsR01GM120272 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI IVANOV, ALEXANDER R. · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218500NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM103725NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120272NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAccurate estimation of false discovery rate (FDR) of spectral identification is a central problem in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Over the past two decades, target-decoy approaches (TDAs) and decoy-free approaches (DFAs) have been widely used to estimate FDR. TDAs use a database of decoy species to faithfully model score distributions of incorrect peptide-spectrum matches (PSMs). DFAs, on the other hand, fit two-component mixture models to learn the parameters of correct and incorrect PSM score distributions. While conceptually straightforward, both approaches lead to problems in practice, particularly in experiments that push instrumentation to the limit and generate low fragmentation-efficiency and low signal-to-noise-ratio spectra.

resultsWe introduce a new decoy-free framework for FDR estimation that generalizes present DFAs while exploiting more search data in a manner similar to TDAs. Our approach relies on multi-component mixtures, in which score distributions corresponding to the correct PSMs, best incorrect PSMs and second-best incorrect PSMs are modeled by the skew normal family. We derive EM algorithms to estimate parameters of these distributions from the scores of best and second-best PSMs associated with each experimental spectrum. We evaluate our models on multiple proteomics datasets and a HeLa cell digest case study consisting of more than a million spectra in total. We provide evidence of improved performance over existing DFAs and improved stability and speed over TDAs without any performance degradation. We propose that the new strategy has the potential to extend beyond peptide identification and reduce the need for TDA on all analytical platforms. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/shawn-peng/FDR-estimation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

ProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinHeLa CellsHumansPeptidesPeptides

Identifiers

PMID33381824
PMCPMC7773488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.