ArticleCerebral cortex communications2020
Subthalamic Nucleus Subregion Stimulation Modulates Inhibitory Control.
Article in Cerebral cortex communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hyperdirect projections from the supplementary motor area mediate subthalamic stimulation effects on movement initiation and inhibition in Parkinson's disease.Brain communications · 2026Article
- A novel methodology for localizing pallidal deep brain stimulation leads.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2026Article
- Altered Cognitive Networks Connectivity in Parkinson's Disease During the Microlesion Period After Deep Brain Stimulation.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2024Article
- Subthalamic control of impulsive actions: insights from deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Focused stimulation of dorsal versus ventral subthalamic nucleus enhances action-outcome learning in patients with Parkinson's disease.Brain communications · 2024Article
- Stimulation of non-motor subthalamic nucleus impairs selective response inhibition via prefrontal connectivity.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Functional Connectivity and Anxiety Improvement After Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease.Clinical interventions in aging · 2023Article
- Effects of deep brain stimulation target on the activation and suppression of action impulses.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Article
- Towards Conceptual Clarification of Proactive Inhibitory Control: A Review.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Increased Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Amplitude Impairs Inhibitory Control of Eye Movements in Parkinson's Disease.Neuromodulation : journal of the International Neuromodulation Society · 2022Article
- Impulsivity is associated with firing regularity in parkinsonian ventral subthalamic nucleus.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2022Article
- Altered Spontaneous Neural Activity and Functional Connectivity in Parkinson's Disease With Subthalamic Microlesion.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) often experience reductions in the proficiency to inhibit actions. The motor symptoms of PD can be effectively treated with deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), a key structure in the frontal-striatal network that may be directly involved in regulating inhibitory control. However, the precise role of the STN in stopping control is unclear. The STN consists of functional subterritories linked to dissociable cortical networks, although the boundaries of the subregions are still under debate. We investigated whether stimulating the dorsal and ventral subregions of the STN would show dissociable effects on ability to stop. We studied 12 PD patients with STN DBS. Patients with two adjacent contacts positioned within the bounds of the dorsal and ventral STN completed two testing sessions (OFF medication) with low amplitude stimulation (0.4 mA) at either the dorsal or ventral contacts bilaterally, while performing the stop task. Ventral, but not dorsal, DBS improved stopping latencies. Go reactions were similar between dorsal and ventral DBS STN. Stimulation in the ventral, but not dorsal, subregion of the STN improved stopping speed, confirming the involvement of the STN in stopping control and supporting the STN functional subregions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.