ArticleVirusdisease2020
Rotavirus and adenovirus detecting method: sensitivity and specificity of rapid antigen testing: prospective study in one region of Ireland.
Article in Virusdisease, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Evaluation of a Nanoparticle-Based Immunoassay for Rotavirus Detection: A Suitable Alternative to ELISA and PCR in Low-Income Setting.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Surveillance and epidemiological characterization of human adenovirus infections among outpatient children with acute gastroenteritis during the COVID-19 epidemic in Shanghai, China.Virology journal · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rotavirus and Adenovirus are common causes of gastroenteritis in children younger than 3 years worldwide. Rapid Antigen Testing (RAT) is a quick and easy tool to detect virus antigen in stool samples and is more specific than sensitive (higher specificity and lesser sensitivity). Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and PCR are more sensitive and specific than RAT. Sensitive and specific tools are required for true diagnosis. We aim to determine sensitivity and specificity of RAT versus PCR testing of rotavirus and adenovirus. From November 18th 2016 to November 18th 2017, all children up to 3 years of age who presented to Mayo University Hospital with vomiting and diarrhoea had their stool tested for rotavirus and adenovirus by RAT in Galway University Hospital Laboratory (GUHL) and by PCR testing in the National Virus Reference Laboratory (NVRL) in Dublin; 143 stool samples were tested for Adenovirus, 126 (88%) tested negative at NVRL, two false positive at GUHL, specificity (98.5%). Seventeen were adenovirus positive in the NVRL, two false negative in GUHL, sensitivity (88%); 144 samples were tested for rotavirus, 108 (75%) were RV negative in the NVRL, one false positive at GUHL, specificity (99%); 36 samples were rotavirus positive in the NVRL, ten (28%) false negative in GUHL, sensitivity (72%). RAT has higher specificity than sensitivity and may be useful for mass screening at times of rotavirus or adenovirus outbreaks. PCR remains more sensitive and specific than RAT and is still required for true diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.