Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381610›Full record

ArticleJournal of survey statistics and methodology2020

Measures of the Degree of Departure from Ignorable Sample Selection.

Roderick J A Little, Brady T West, Philip S Boonstra, Jingwei Hu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of survey statistics and methodology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. On the Use of Auxiliary Variables in Multilevel Regression and Poststratification.Statistical science : a review journal of the Institute of Mathematical Statistics · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. A simulation study of diagnostics for selection bias.Journal of official statistics · 2021
    Article
  11. Indices of non-ignorable selection bias for proportions estimated from non-probability samples.Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roderick J A LittleProfessor of Biostatistics at the School of Public Health and Research Professor in the Survey Methodology Program (SMP), Survey Research Center (SRC), Institute for Social Research (ISR), University of Michigan, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.
Brady T WestResearch Associate Professor in the Survey Methodology Program (SMP), Survey Research Center (SRC), Institute for Social Research (ISR), University of Michigan, 426 Thompson Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1248, USA.
Philip S BoonstraResearch Assistant Professor of Biostatistics in the School of Public Health, University of Michigan, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Jingwei HuSurvey Research Director at SurveyPlus Ltd., 1079 Nanhai Street, Shuma Building 201A, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518023, China.

Funding

Indices of Selection Bias for Non‐Probability SamplesR21HD090366 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI WEST, BRADY T · 2017 to 2018
$401k
NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD090366
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the current focus of survey researchers on "big data" that are not selected by probability sampling, measures of the degree of potential sampling bias arising from this nonrandom selection are sorely needed. Existing indices of this degree of departure from probability sampling, like the R-indicator, are based on functions of the propensity of inclusion in the sample, estimated by modeling the inclusion probability as a function of auxiliary variables. These methods are agnostic about the relationship between the inclusion probability and survey outcomes, which is a crucial feature of the problem. We propose a simple index of degree of departure from ignorable sample selection that corrects this deficiency, which we call the standardized measure of unadjusted bias (SMUB). The index is based on normal pattern-mixture models for nonresponse applied to this sample selection problem and is grounded in the model-based framework of nonignorable selection first proposed in the context of nonresponse by Don Rubin in 1976. The index depends on an inestimable parameter that measures the deviation from selection at random, which ranges between the values zero and one. We propose the use of a central value of this parameter, 0.5, for computing a point index, and computing the values of SMUB at zero and one to provide a range of the index in a sensitivity analysis. We also provide a fully Bayesian approach for computing credible intervals for the SMUB, reflecting uncertainty in the values of all of the input parameters. The proposed methods have been implemented in R and are illustrated using real data from the National Survey of Family Growth.

Indexed as

Measures of selection biasNational Survey of Family GrowthNonignorable sample selectionNonprobability samplingSampling bias

Identifiers

PMID33381610
PMCPMC7750890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.