Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381574›Full record

Trial reportBioMed research international2020

Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar.

Teppei Abiko, Shin Murata, Yoshihiro Kai, Hideki Nakano, Dai Matsuo, Michio Kawaguchi

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Teppei AbikoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5131-9834
Shin MurataDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Yoshihiro KaiDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Hideki NakanoDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kyoto Tachibana University, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2312-6154
Dai MatsuoASICS Trading Company Limited, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Michio KawaguchiASICS Trading Company Limited, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Kyoto Tachibana University · JPAsics (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was aimed at comparing the muscle activities and gait parameters between the toe-grip bar insoles and general insoles during walking using randomized crossover design. Twelve healthy men participated in this study. Temporal and spatial gait parameters and electromyography (EMG) results were concurrently collected while the subjects walked along an 8 m walkway with the developed and general insoles. Developed insoles provide a three-dimensional mesh structure at the toe portion and a convex bulging structure (toe-grip bar) near the center of the proximal phalanx of the first to fifth toe. The linear mixed model was used to estimate the toe-grip bar insole effect. The results showed that there were no sequence or period effects for any of the examined parameters. During the stance phase, those wearing the developed insoles had significantly higher %IEMG for the TA, GM, and GL than those wearing the general insoles (TA: 5.03%IEMG,

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesGaitWalkingAdultCross-Over StudiesElectromyographyHumansLinear ModelsMaleMaterials TestingMiddle AgedShoes

Identifiers

PMID33381574
PMCPMC7762632
OpenAlexW3112637619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.