Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381570›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2020

Artificial Intelligence in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: From Anatomy to Prognosis.

Giuseppe Muscogiuri, Marly Van Assen, Christian Tesche, Carlo N De Cecco, Mattia Chiesa, Stefano Scafuri, Marco Guglielmo, Andrea Baggiano, Laura Fusini, Andrea I Guaricci and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Giuseppe MuscogiuriCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Marly Van AssenDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Christian TescheDepartment of Cardiology, Munich University Clinic, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Carlo N De CeccoDivision of Cardiothoracic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mattia ChiesaCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Stefano ScafuriDivision of Interventional Structural Cardiology, Cardiothoracovascular Department, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy.
Marco GuglielmoCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Andrea BaggianoCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Laura FusiniCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Andrea I GuaricciInstitute of Cardiovascular Disease, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, University Hospital "Policlinico Consorziale" of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Mark G RabbatLoyola University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Gianluca PontoneCentro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Milan, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1339-6679
Centro Cardiologico Monzino · ITEmory University · USAzienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · ITLoyola University Chicago · USSt.-Johannes-Hospital Dortmund · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is widely used as a diagnostic tool for evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD). Despite the excellent capability to rule-out CAD, CCTA may overestimate the degree of stenosis; furthermore, CCTA analysis can be time consuming, often requiring advanced postprocessing techniques. In consideration of the most recent ESC guidelines on CAD management, which will likely increase CCTA volume over the next years, new tools are necessary to shorten reporting time and improve the accuracy for the detection of ischemia-inducing coronary lesions. The application of artificial intelligence (AI) may provide a helpful tool in CCTA, improving the evaluation and quantification of coronary stenosis, plaque characterization, and assessment of myocardial ischemia. Furthermore, in comparison with existing risk scores, machine-learning algorithms can better predict the outcome utilizing both imaging findings and clinical parameters. Medical AI is moving from the research field to daily clinical practice, and with the increasing number of CCTA examinations, AI will be extensively utilized in cardiac imaging. This review is aimed at illustrating the state of the art in AI-based CCTA applications and future clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceComputed Tomography AngiographyAlgorithmsCalciumCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMachine LearningMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaPhenotypePlaque, AtheroscleroticCalcium

Identifiers

PMID33381570
PMCPMC7762640
OpenAlexW3112931100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.