ArticleInternational journal of genomics2020
A Novel Four-Gene Prognostic Signature as a Risk Biomarker in Cervical Cancer.
Article in International journal of genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostic Role of Matrix Metalloproteinases in Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis.Cancer control : journal of the Moffitt Cancer CenterPooled it
- Article
- Desmoglein-2 as a cancer modulator: friend or foe?Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Metadata analysis to explore hub of the hub-genes highlighting their functions, pathways and regulators for cervical cancer diagnosis and therapies.Discover oncology · 2022Article
- Bioinformatics Screening of Potential Biomarkers from mRNA Expression Profiles to Discover Drug Targets and Agents for Cervical Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Five candidate biomarkers associated with the diagnosis and prognosis of cervical cancer.Bioscience reports · 2021Article
- Expression Profiles Reveal Involvement ofTechnology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical cancer (CC) is a major malignancy affecting women worldwide, with limited treatment options for patients with advanced disease. The aim of this study was to identify novel prognostic biomarkers for CC.
methodsRNA-Seq data from four Gene Expression Omnibus datasets (GSE5787, GSE6791, GSE26511, and GSE63514) were used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between CC and normal cervical tissues. Functional and enrichment analyses of the DEGs were performed using the Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) database and the Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). The Oncomine database, Cytoscape software, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses were used for in-depth screening of hub DEGs. The Cox regression was then used to develop a prognostic signature, which was in turn used to create a nomogram.
resultsA total of 207 DEGs were identified in the tissue samples, eight of which were prognostically significant in terms of overall survival (OS). Thereafter, a novel four-gene signature consisting of DSG2, MMP1, SPP1, and MCM2 was developed and validated using stepwise Cox analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values were 0.785, 0.609, and 0.686 in the training, verification, and combination groups, respectively. The protein expression levels of the four genes were well validated by the western blotting. Moreover, the nomogram analysis showed that a combination of this four-gene signature plus lymph node metastasis (LNM) status effectively predicted the 1- and 3-year OS probabilities of CC patients with accuracies of 69.01% and 83.93%, respectively.
conclusionsWe developed a four-gene signature that can accurately predict the prognosis in terms of OS, of CC patients, and could be a valuable tool for designing treatment strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.