ArticleIEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions2020
Multi-disease Deep Brain Stimulation.
Article in IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subthreshold electrical stimulation as a low power electrical treatment for stroke rehabilitation.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Controlling Clinical States Governed by Different Temporal Dynamics With Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation: A Principled Framework.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Current closed-loop deep brain stimulation (DBS) devices can generally tackle one disorder. This paper presents the design and evaluation of a multi-disease closed-loop DBS device that can sense multiple brain biomarkers, detect a disorder, and adaptively deliver electrical stimulation pulses based on the disease state. The device consists of: (i) a neural sensor, (ii) a controller involving a feature extractor, a disease classifier, and a control strategy, and (iii) neural stimulator. The neural sensor records and processes local field potentials and spikes from within the brain using two low-frequency and high-frequency channels. The feature extractor digitally processes the output of the neural sensor, and extracts five potential biomarkers: alpha, beta, slow gamma, high-frequency oscillations, and spikes. The disease classifier identifies the type of the neurological disorder through an analysis of the biomarkers' amplitude features. The control strategy considers the disease state and supplies the stimulation settings to the neural stimulator. Both the disease classifier and control strategy are based on fuzzy algorithms. The neural stimulator generates electrical stimulation pulses according to the control commands, and delivers them to the target area of the brain. The device can generate current stimulation pulses with specific amplitude, frequency, and duration. The fabricated device has the maximum radius of 15 mm. Its total weight including the circuit board, battery and battery holder is 5.1 g. The performance of the integrated device has been evaluated through six bench and in-vitro experiments. The experimental results are presented, analyzed, and discussed. Six bench and in-vitro experiments were conducted using sinusoidal, normal pre-recorded, and diseased neural signals representing normal, epilepsy, depression and PD conditions. The results obtained through these tests indicate the successful neural sensing, classification, control, and neural stimulating performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.