ArticleCureus2020
Immediate Postoperative Complications in Adult Tracheostomy.
Article in Cureus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Airway assessment and management in head and neck cancer surgery.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2025Article
- Assessing the Comprehensibility and Trustworthiness of Online Tracheostomy Care Resources.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
- Sudden Death in a Rare Case Due to Tracheo-Innominate Artery Fistula.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Impact of Vertical and Horizontal Skin Incisions on Outcome Measures in Tracheostomies.Cureus · 2024Article
- [Factors related with microbiological contamination of surgical site in patients undergoing tracheotomy].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023Observational
- Thyroid-split tracheostomy: short- and long-term outcomes.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2023Article
- Percutaneous ultrasound-guided versus bronchoscopy-guided dilatational tracheostomy after median sternotomy: A case-control study.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective Tracheostomy is one of the oldest operations for the management of airway obstruction. With time, indications expanded to prolonged mechanical ventilation, and currently, the majority of tracheostomies are done for this reason. There are several techniques used in a tracheostomy procedure, depending on surgeon preference. Immediate complications such as bleeding, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, airway fire, and posterior tracheal wall perforation with esophageal injury are rare, although they do occur, and must be managed accordingly. This study aimed to assess differences in types and rates of immediate postoperative complications in patients undergoing tracheostomy when performed under general anesthesia and local anesthesia (awake tracheostomies) at a large academic institution. This is a continuing ongoing literature reporting tracheostomy adverse events. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patients who underwent tracheostomy placement between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2019 at the Detroit Medical Center, USA. Postoperative complications such as bleeding, pneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, airway fire, and posterior tracheal perforation were collected along with gender, age, and revision tracheostomy status. IBM SPSS Statistics (IBM Inc., Armonk, USA) was used for statistical analysis with the statical significance defined as a p<0.05. Results A total of 1,469 patient charts were reviewed. Of these, 1,342 met the inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which, males were 57.2% (n=768), and females were 42.8% (n=574). The age range was 18 years to 96 years (mean=58.03; SD= 15.97), and BMI range was 12-83 (mean=28.77; SD=7.885). Multinomial logistic regression was performed to determine whether age, BMI, sex, and revision tracheostomies were represented across both general and awake tracheostomy groups proportionally to their numbers in the total sample. It showed non-significant value for age (χ2=0.776, p=0.378), BMI (χ2=0.004, p=0.947), but significant value for sex (χ2=4.645, p=0.031), revision tracheostomy (χ2=18.282, p<0.001), indicating that males and revision tracheostomies over-represented in awake tracheostomies. Next, Pearson correlation analysis was performed to determine any significant linear relationship between age, sex, and tracheostomy complications. It showed a significant positive correlation between age and tracheal stomal infection [r(1,340)=0.062, p=0.022]. An independent sample t-test showed a statistically significant difference between the mean pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum of general (n=1,277, mean=0.01, SD=0.088) and awake tracheostomies (n=65, mean=0.08, SD=0.269, t=2.069, p=0.043). Pneumothorax pneumomediastinum complications between the general tracheostomy and awake tracheostomy odds ratio (OR)-6.22, indicates the chance of pneumothorax /pneumomediastinum complication is 6.22 times more in awake tracheostomy than general tracheostomy. Based on the above statistical analysis, we rejected the null hypothesis. Conclusions Tracheostomy is the procedure of choice to relieve the upper airway obstruction and treat patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. A slightly higher number of Immediate postoperative complications in awake tracheostomy were noticed in patients with more surgically challenging revision tracheostomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.