Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381252›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2020

Manipulation of single cells inside nanoliter water droplets using acoustic forces.

Michael S Gerlt, Dominik Haidas, Alexandre Ratschat, Philipp Suter, Petra S Dittrich, Jürg Dual

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Acoustofluidic Droplet Sorter Based on Single Phase Focused Transducers.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michael S GerltDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Institute for Mechanical Systems (IMES), Tannenstrasse 3, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2861-7435
Dominik HaidasDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Bioanalytics Group, Mattenstrasse 26, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland.
Alexandre RatschatDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Institute for Mechanical Systems (IMES), Tannenstrasse 3, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-4836-7680
Philipp SuterDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Institute for Mechanical Systems (IMES), Tannenstrasse 3, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8019-3006
Petra S DittrichDepartment of Biosystems Science and Engineering, ETH Zurich, Bioanalytics Group, Mattenstrasse 26, CH-4058 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-8403
Jürg DualDepartment of Mechanical and Process Engineering, ETH Zurich, Institute for Mechanical Systems (IMES), Tannenstrasse 3, CH-8092 Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-5861-9058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Droplet microfluidics enables high-throughput screening of single cells and is particularly valuable for applications, where the secreted compounds are analyzed. Typically, optical methods are employed for analysis, which are limited in their applicability as labeling protocols are required. Alternative label-free methods such as mass spectrometry would broaden the range of assays but are harmful to the cells, which is detrimental for some applications such as directed evolution. In this context, separation of cells from supernatant is beneficial prior to the analysis to retain viable cells. In this work, we propose an in-droplet separation method based on contactless and label-free acoustic particle manipulation. In a microfluidic chip, nanoliter droplets containing particles are produced at a T-junction. The particles are trapped in the tip of the droplet by the interplay of acoustic forces in two dimensions and internal flow fields. The droplets are subsequently split at a second T-junction into two daughter droplets-one containing the supernatant and the other containing the corresponding particles. The separation efficiency is measured in detail for polystyrene (PS) beads as a function of droplet speed, size, split ratio, and particle concentration. Further, single-bead (PS) and single-cell (yeast) experiments were carried out. At a throughput of 114 droplets/min, a separation efficiency of 100% ± 0% was achieved for more than 150 droplets. Finally, mammalian cells and bacteria were introduced into the system to test its versatility. This work demonstrates a robust, non-invasive strategy to perform single yeast cell-supernatant sampling in nanoliter volumes.

Identifiers

PMID33381252
PMCPMC7749759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.