ArticleFrontiers in genetics2020
ChIAMM: A Mixture Model for Statistical Analysis of Long-Range Chromatin Interactions From ChIA-PET Experiments.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- DeepChIA-PET: Accurately predicting ChIA-PET from Hi-C and ChIP-seq with deep dilated networks.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chromatin interaction analysis by paired-end tag sequencing (ChIA-PET) is an important experimental method for detecting specific protein-mediated chromatin loops genome-wide at high resolution. Here, we proposed a new statistical approach with a mixture model, chromatin interaction analysis using mixture model (ChIAMM), to detect significant chromatin interactions from ChIA-PET data. The statistical model is cast into a Bayesian framework to consider more systematic biases: the genomic distance, local enrichment, mappability, and GC content. Using different ChIA-PET datasets, we evaluated the performance of ChIAMM and compared it with the existing methods, including ChIA-PET Tool, ChiaSig, Mango, ChIA-PET2, and ChIAPoP. The result showed that the new approach performed better than most top existing methods in detecting significant chromatin interactions in ChIA-PET experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.