Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381130›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Genome-Wide DArTSeq Genotyping and Phenotypic Based Assessment of Within and Among Accessions Diversity and Effective Sample Size in the Diverse Sorghum, Pearl Millet, and Pigeonpea Landraces.

Victor Allan, Mani Vetriventhan, Ramachandran Senthil, S Geetha, Santosh Deshpande, Abhishek Rathore, Vinod Kumar, Prabhat Singh, Surender Reddymalla, Vânia C R Azevedo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The genomics of t'ef and finger millet domestication and spread.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Biotechnological Advances to Improve Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crops.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Victor AllanCentre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India.
Mani VetriventhanInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Ramachandran SenthilInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
S GeethaCentre for Plant Breeding and Genetics, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Coimbatore, India.
Santosh DeshpandeInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Abhishek RathoreInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Vinod KumarInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Prabhat SinghInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Surender ReddymallaInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
Vânia C R AzevedoInternational Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Hyderabad, India.
International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics · INTamil Nadu Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Germplasm should be conserved in such a way that the genetic integrity of a given accession is maintained. In most genebanks, landraces constitute a major portion of collections, wherein the extent of genetic diversity within and among landraces of crops vary depending on the extent of outcrossing and selection intensity infused by farmers. In this study, we assessed the level of diversity within and among 108 diverse landraces and wild accessions using both phenotypic and genotypic characterization. This included 36 accessions in each of sorghum, pearl millet, and pigeonpea, conserved at ICRISAT genebank. We genotyped about 15 to 25 individuals within each accession, totaling 1,980 individuals using the DArTSeq approach. This resulted in 45,249, 19,052, and 8,211 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in pearl millet, sorghum, and pigeonpea, respectively. Sorghum had the lowest average phenotypic (0.090) and genotypic (0.135) within accession distances, while pearl millet had the highest average phenotypic (0.227) and genotypic (0.245) distances. Pigeonpea had an average of 0.203 phenotypic and 0.168 genotypic within accession distances. Analysis of molecular variance also confirms the lowest variability within accessions of sorghum (26.3%) and the highest of 80.2% in pearl millet, while an intermediate in pigeonpea (57.0%). The effective sample size required to capture maximum variability and to retain rare alleles while regeneration ranged from 47 to 101 for sorghum, 155 to 203 for pearl millet, and 77 to 89 for pigeonpea accessions. This study will support genebank curators, in understanding the dynamics of population within and among accessions, in devising appropriate germplasm conservation strategies, and aid in their utilization for crop improvement.

Indexed as

DArTseqeffective population sizelandracespearl milletpigeonpearegenerationsorghumwithin accession diversity

Identifiers

PMID33381130
PMCPMC7768014
OpenAlexW3113244338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.