Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33381030›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

How the Toxin got its Toxicity.

Timothy N W Jackson, Ivan Koludarov

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Toxins in disguise: Neuropeptide mimicry across animal venoms.General and comparative endocrinology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Genome of venomous caterpillarProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Structural similarities reveal an expansive conotoxin family with a two-finger toxin fold.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Timothy N W JacksonAustralian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Ivan KoludarovAnimal Venomics Group, Justus Leibig University, Giessen, Germany.
University of Giessen · DEUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Venom systems are functional and ecological traits, typically used by one organism to subdue or deter another. A predominant subset of their constituent molecules-"toxins"-share this ecological function and are therefore molecules that mediate interactions between organisms. Such molecules have been referred to as "exochemicals." There has been debate within the field of toxinology concerning the evolutionary pathways leading to the "recruitment" of a gene product for a toxic role within venom. We review these discussions and the evidence interpreted in support of alternate pathways, along with many of the most popular models describing the origin of novel molecular functions in general. We note that such functions may arise with or without gene duplication occurring and are often the consequence of a gene product encountering a novel "environment," i.e., a range of novel partners for molecular interaction. After stressing the distinction between "activity" and "function," we describe in detail the results of a recent study which reconstructed the evolutionary history of a multigene family that has been recruited as a toxin and argue that these results indicate that a pluralistic approach to understanding the origin of novel functions is advantageous. This leads us to recommend that an expansive approach be taken to the definition of "neofunctionalization"-simply the origins of a novel molecular function by any process-and "recruitment"-the "weaponization" of a molecule via the acquisition of a toxic function in venom, by any process. Recruitment does not occur at the molecular level or even at the level of gene expression, but only when a confluence of factors results in the ecological deployment of a physiologically active molecule as a toxin. Subsequent to recruitment, the evolutionary regime of a gene family may shift into a more dynamic form of "birth-and-death." Thus, recruitment leads to a form of "downwards causation," in which a change at the ecological level at which whole organisms interact leads to a change in patterns of evolution at the genomic level.

Indexed as

duplicationevolutionfunctiongene expressiongenomicsmoleculetoxinvenom

Identifiers

PMID33381030
PMCPMC7767849
OpenAlexW3111458910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.