Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33380993›Full record

ReviewHSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery2020

Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.

Bhavik H Patel, Yining Lu, Avinesh Agarwalla, Richard N Puzzitiello, Benedict U Nwachukwu, Gregory L Cvetanovich, Jorge Chahla, Brian Forsythe

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. [Research progress in biomechanics of Bristow-Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder dislocation].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Bhavik H PatelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7245-578X
Yining LuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
Avinesh AgarwallaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, NY USA.
Richard N PuzzitielloDepartment of Orthopaedics, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA USA.
Benedict U NwachukwuDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY USA.
Gregory L CvetanovichDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH USA.
Jorge ChahlaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
Brian ForsytheDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL USA.
University of Illinois Chicago · USHospital for Special Surgery · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · USTufts Medical Center · USWestchester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is increased emphasis on properly allocating healthcare resources to optimize value within orthopedic surgery. Establishing time to maximal medical improvement (MMI) can inform clinical decision-making and practice guidelines. PURPOSE: We sought (1) to evaluate the time to MMI as predicted by commonly used patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for evaluation of shoulder stabilization and (2) to evaluate typical time to return to sports and employment following surgery.

methodsA systematic review of the Medline database was conducted to identify outcome studies reporting sequential follow-up at multiple time points, up to a minimum of 2 years after shoulder stabilization surgery. The included studies examined the outcomes of arthroscopic or open surgical techniques on anterior instability. Clinically significant improvements were evaluated utilizing the minimal clinically important difference specific to each PROM. Secondary outcomes included range of motion, return to sport/work, and recurrent instability.

resultsTen studies comprising 590 surgically managed cases of anterior shoulder instability were included (78% arthroscopic, 22% open). Clinically significant improvements in PROMs were achieved up to 1 year post-operatively for Rowe, Western Ontario Instability Index (WOSI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) scores. For the three most utilized tools (Rowe, WOSI, ASES), the majority of improvement occurred in the first 6 post-operative months. Clinically significant improvements in Constant Score and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) were achieved up to 6 months and 2 years after surgery, respectively. No clinically significant improvements were achieved on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) tool.

conclusionMaximal medical improvement as determined by commonly utilized PROMs occurs by 1 year after operative management of anterior shoulder instability. The DASH tool does not appear to demonstrate a reliable time frame for clinically significant outcome improvement.

Indexed as

BankartLatarjetmaximal medical improvementminimal clinically important differenceshoulder dislocationshoulder stabilizationvalue

Identifiers

PMID33380993
PMCPMC7749924
OpenAlexW3085631878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.