Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33380783›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2020

Impact of Vitreal Tamponade on Functional Outcomes in Vitrectomy with ILM Peeling in Primary Macula-Involving Retinal Detachment: A Retrospective Analysis.

Mario Deiss, Cagdas Kaya, Isabel B Pfister, Justus G Garweg

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The double-edged role of internal limiting membrane peeling during primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mario Deiss *University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
Cagdas Kaya *Swiss Eye Institute, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.
Isabel B PfisterSwiss Eye Institute, Rotkreuz, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8752-8390
Justus G GarwegUniversity of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-3973-5082
Berner Augenklinik am Lindenhofspital · CHUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo compare visual outcomes of vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and failed SF

methodsRetrospective analysis of 82 eyes with retinal detachment and mild, but without advanced proliferative retinopathy (PVR ≥C2) requiring vitrectomy for FiRD. Group 1 comprised 23 eyes that underwent SF

resultsPreoperative visual acuity (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters) was 13.5 ± 19.1 in group 1 and 14.0 ± 18.3 in group 2 (

conclusionOur findings suggest that if retinal traction is completely relieved at the end of surgery, vitrectomy with ILM peeling and SF

Indexed as

ILM peelinginternal limiting membranemacula-offretinal detachmentsilicone oil tamponadevitrectomy

Identifiers

PMID33380783
PMCPMC7769588
OpenAlexW3114078565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.