Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33380574›Full record

ArticleThe Korean journal of pain2021

Ultrasound-guided epidural block in axial spondyloarthritis patients with limited spine mobility: a randomized controlled trial.

A M Elsaman, A Hamed, A R Radwan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Korean journal of pain, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04143165 (Ultrasound Guided Epidural Block in Axial SPA Patient With Limited Spine Mobility), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04143165 phase4completednot on this map

Ultrasound Guided Epidural Block in Axial SPA Patient With Limited Spine Mobility: a Prospective Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled52ConditionsEpidural Block in Axial SpondyloarthritisArmsEpidural block with lidocaine and triamcinilone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Use of the Oswestry Disability Index in ankylosing spondylitis.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A M ElsamanDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5759-2009
A HamedDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Minia University Hospital, Elminia, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6364-938X
A R RadwanDepartment of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Sohag University Hospital, Sohag, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0438-1384
Sohag University · EGMinia University Hospital · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEvaluation of the effectiveness of caudal epidural injection on pain, spine mobility, disease activity, and activity of daily living in axial spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients.

methodsA total sample of 47 patients were registered in this study. They were randomly assigned into 2 groups; Group I received caudal epidural injections, ultrasound-guided, with 1% lidocaine hydrochloride mixed with triamcinolone, whereas Group II did not receive any injections. All participants fulfilled the ASAS criteria for axial SpA. Outcome measures were as follows: visual analogue scale, Oswestry disability index (ODI), modified Schober test, lateral lumbar flexion, and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) with assessment at baseline, 2 weeks, and 8 weeks post-treatment. This clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov under the number NCT04143165.

resultsThere was a significant difference between both groups regarding pain, ODI, spine mobility and ASDAS scores in favor of group I. This effect was at its maximum after 2 weeks. Despite the decline of this effect after 2 months, the difference between the groups remained significant. Higher disease activity, younger age, and shorter disease duration were associated with better outcomes.

conclusionsEpidural injection of lidocaine and triamcinolone is a cost effective and a practical technique for controlling pain, as well as improving the function of the spine and disease activity scores in axial SpA patients with acceptable complications and relatively sustained effect.

Indexed as

Back PainEpiduralInjectionsLidocaineNerve BlockPain ManagementSpineSpondylarthritisSpondylitisTriamcinolone

Identifiers

PMID33380574
PMCPMC7783858
OpenAlexW3113864514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.