Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33380471›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2021

Dissecting the Roles of Supervised and Unsupervised Learning in Perceptual Discrimination Judgments.

Yonatan Loewenstein, Ofri Raviv, Merav Ahissar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What size and shape am I?Frontiers in psychology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yonatan LoewensteinThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences yonatan@huji.ac.il.ORCID 0000-0003-2577-2317
Ofri RavivThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences.
Merav AhissarThe Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences.ORCID 0000-0001-7694-8111

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our ability to compare sensory stimuli is a fundamental cognitive function, which is known to be affected by two biases: choice bias, which reflects a preference for a given response, and contraction bias, which reflects a tendency to perceive stimuli as similar to previous ones. To test whether both reflect supervised processes, we designed feedback protocols aimed to modify them and tested them in human participants. Choice bias was readily modifiable. However, contraction bias was not. To compare these results to those predicted from an optimal supervised process, we studied a noise-matched optimal linear discriminator (Perceptron). In this model, both biases were substantially modified, indicating that the "resilience" of contraction bias to feedback does not maximize performance. These results suggest that perceptual discrimination is a hierarchical, two-stage process. In the first, stimulus statistics are learned and integrated with representations in an unsupervised process that is impenetrable to external feedback. In the second, a binary judgment, learned in a supervised way, is applied to the combined percept.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBayes TheoremChoice BehaviorDiscrimination, PsychologicalFeedback, PsychologicalFemaleHumansJudgmentLearningMaleNeural Networks, ComputerPerceptionPsychomotor Performancecontraction biasfrequency discriminationperceptionsupervised learningunsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID33380471
PMCPMC7842757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.