Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33380456›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2021

True scale-free networks hidden by finite size effects.

Matteo Serafino, Giulio Cimini, Amos Maritan, Andrea Rinaldo, Samir Suweis, Jayanth R Banavar, Guido Caldarelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The angiogenic growth of cities.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Precision drug design againstFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Friend of a friend models of network growth.Royal Society open science · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matteo SerafinoNetworks Unit, IMT School for Advanced Studies, 55100 Lucca, Italy.
Giulio CiminiDepartment of Physics, University of Rome Tor Vergata, 00133 Rome, Italy.
Amos MaritanDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Andrea RinaldoLaboratory of Ecohydrology, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland; andrea.rinaldo@epfl.ch guido.caldarelli@unive.it.
Samir SuweisDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, Italy.
Jayanth R BanavarDepartment of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403.ORCID 0000-0002-9752-6871
Guido CaldarelliDepartment of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, 30172 Venice, Italy; andrea.rinaldo@epfl.ch guido.caldarelli@unive.it.ORCID 0000-0001-9377-3616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We analyze about 200 naturally occurring networks with distinct dynamical origins to formally test whether the commonly assumed hypothesis of an underlying scale-free structure is generally viable. This has recently been questioned on the basis of statistical testing of the validity of power law distributions of network degrees. Specifically, we analyze by finite size scaling analysis the datasets of real networks to check whether the purported departures from power law behavior are due to the finiteness of sample size. We find that a large number of the networks follows a finite size scaling hypothesis without any self-tuning. This is the case of biological protein interaction networks, technological computer and hyperlink networks, and informational networks in general. Marked deviations appear in other cases, especially involving infrastructure and transportation but also in social networks. We conclude that underlying scale invariance properties of many naturally occurring networks are extant features often clouded by finite size effects due to the nature of the sample data.

Indexed as

degree distributionfinite size scalingnetwork formpower lawsstatistical physics

Identifiers

PMID33380456
PMCPMC7812829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.