Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33380322›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

An interpretable risk prediction model for healthcare with pattern attention.

Sundreen Asad Kamal, Changchang Yin, Buyue Qian, Ping Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. SepsisCalc: Integrating Clinical Calculators into Early Sepsis Prediction via Dynamic Temporal Graph Construction.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. SepsisLab: Early Sepsis Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification and Active Sensing.KDD : proceedings. International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining · 2024
    Article
  4. Rethinking Human-AI Collaboration in Complex Medical Decision Making: A Case Study in Sepsis Diagnosis.Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. CHI Conference · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Informatics and machine learning methods for health applications.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sundreen Asad KamalDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.
Changchang YinDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 2015 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Buyue QianDepartment of Computer Science and Technology, Xi'an Jiaotong University, No. 28 Xianning West Road, Xi'an, 710049, Shaanxi, China.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, 2015 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA. zhang.10631@osu.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-4601-0779
The Ohio State University · USXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe availability of massive amount of data enables the possibility of clinical predictive tasks. Deep learning methods have achieved promising performance on the tasks. However, most existing methods suffer from three limitations: (1) There are lots of missing value for real value events, many methods impute the missing value and then train their models based on the imputed values, which may introduce imputation bias. The models' performance is highly dependent on the imputation accuracy. (2) Lots of existing studies just take Boolean value medical events (e.g. diagnosis code) as inputs, but ignore real value medical events (e.g., lab tests and vital signs), which are more important for acute disease (e.g., sepsis) and mortality prediction. (3) Existing interpretable models can illustrate which medical events are conducive to the output results, but are not able to give contributions of patterns among medical events.

methodsIn this study, we propose a novel interpretable Pattern Attention model with Value Embedding (PAVE) to predict the risks of certain diseases. PAVE takes the embedding of various medical events, their values and the corresponding occurring time as inputs, leverage self-attention mechanism to attend to meaningful patterns among medical events for risk prediction tasks. Because only the observed values are embedded into vectors, we don't need to impute the missing values and thus avoids the imputations bias. Moreover, the self-attention mechanism is helpful for the model interpretability, which means the proposed model can output which patterns cause high risks.

resultsWe conduct sepsis onset prediction and mortality prediction experiments on a publicly available dataset MIMIC-III and our proprietary EHR dataset. The experimental results show that PAVE outperforms existing models. Moreover, by analyzing the self-attention weights, our model outputs meaningful medical event patterns related to mortality.

conclusionsPAVE learns effective medical event representation by incorporating the values and occurring time, which can improve the risk prediction performance. Moreover, the presented self-attention mechanism can not only capture patients' health state information, but also output the contributions of various medical event patterns, which pave the way for interpretable clinical risk predictions. AVAILABILITY: The code for this paper is available at: https://github.com/yinchangchang/PAVE .

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHumansEHRInterpretabilityRisk predictionSelf-attention

Identifiers

PMID33380322
PMCPMC7772928
OpenAlexW3118197078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.