Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33380319›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2020

Annotation and extraction of age and temporally-related events from clinical histories.

Judy Hong, Anahita Davoudi, Shun Yu, Danielle L Mowery

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Informatics and machine learning methods for health applications.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Judy HongDepartment of Life Sciences and Management, University of Pennsylvania, 425 S. University Ave, Levin 101, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Anahita DavoudiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Shun YuDivision of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Danielle L MoweryDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 3700 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. dlmowery@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3802-4457

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAge and time information stored within the histories of clinical notes can provide valuable insights for assessing a patient's disease risk, understanding disease progression, and studying therapeutic outcomes. However, details of age and temporally-specified clinical events are not well captured, consistently codified, and readily available to research databases for study.

methodsWe expanded upon existing annotation schemes to capture additional age and temporal information, conducted an annotation study to validate our expanded schema, and developed a prototypical, rule-based Named Entity Recognizer to extract our novel clinical named entities (NE). The annotation study was conducted on 138 discharge summaries from the pre-annotated 2014 ShARe/CLEF eHealth Challenge corpus. In addition to existing NE classes (TIMEX3, SUBJECT_CLASS, DISEASE_DISORDER), our schema proposes 3 additional NEs (AGE, PROCEDURE, OTHER_EVENTS). We also propose new attributes, e.g., "degree_relation" which captures the degree of biological relation for subjects annotated under SUBJECT_CLASS. As a proof of concept, we applied the schema to 49 H&P notes to encode pertinent history information for a lung cancer cohort study.

resultsAn abundance of information was captured under the new OTHER_EVENTS, PROCEDURE and AGE classes, with 23%, 10% and 8% of all annotated NEs belonging to the above classes, respectively. We observed high inter-annotator agreement of >80% for AGE and TIMEX3; the automated NLP system achieved F1 scores of 86% (AGE) and 86% (TIMEX3). Age and temporally-specified mentions within past medical, family, surgical, and social histories were common in our lung cancer data set; annotation is ongoing to support this translational research study.

conclusionsOur annotation schema and NLP system can encode historical events from clinical notes to support clinical and translational research studies.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesHumansMedical informaticsNatural language processingTemporality

Identifiers

PMID33380319
PMCPMC7772895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.