Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33379892›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2020

Sensorimotor adaptation of speech depends on the direction of auditory feedback alteration.

Hardik Kothare, Inez Raharjo, Vikram Ramanarayanan, Kamalini Ranasinghe, Benjamin Parrell, Keith Johnson, John F Houde, Srikantan S Nagarajan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neurophysiological Evidence of Sensory Prediction Errors Driving Speech Sensorimotor Adaptation.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  2. Divided Attention Has Limited Effects on Speech Sensorimotor Control.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hardik KothareUC Berkeley - UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.ORCID s0000000343050334
Inez RaharjoUC Berkeley - UCSF Graduate Program in Bioengineering, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Vikram RamanarayananEducational Testing Service R&D, San Francisco, California 94105, USA.
Kamalini RanasingheDepartment of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Benjamin ParrellDepartment of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53715, USA.
Keith JohnsonDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
John F HoudeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
Srikantan S NagarajanDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.

Funding

The role of the cerebellum in speechR01DC017091 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI John Francis Houde, RICHARD IVRY · 2019 to 2026
$4.5M
Neuroimaging of Speech Motor ControlR01DC010145 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
Imaging sensorimotor adaptation and compensation of speechR01DC013979 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS, NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S. · 2014 to 2018
$1.7M
Role of auditory feedback in speech motor control in Alzheimer's diseaseR01DC017696 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI HOUDE, JOHN FRANCIS, NAGARAJAN, SRIKANTAN S. · 2018 to 2020
$1.5M
Neurophysiological Assessments of Network Dysfunction in Alzheimer's DiseaseK08AG058749 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI RANASINGHE, KAMALINI GAYATHREE · 2019 to 2023
$859k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG058749NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010145NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013979NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017091NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC017696
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A hallmark feature of speech motor control is its ability to learn to anticipate and compensate for persistent feedback alterations, a process referred to as sensorimotor adaptation. Because this process involves adjusting articulation to counter the perceived effects of altering acoustic feedback, there are a number of factors that affect it, including the complex relationship between acoustics and articulation and non-uniformities of speech perception. As a consequence, sensorimotor adaptation is hypothesised to vary as a function of the direction of the applied auditory feedback alteration in vowel formant space. This hypothesis was tested in two experiments where auditory feedback was altered in real time, shifting the frequency values of the first and second formants (F1 and F2) of participants' speech. Shifts were designed on a subject-by-subject basis and sensorimotor adaptation was quantified with respect to the direction of applied shift, normalised for individual speakers. Adaptation was indeed found to depend on the direction of the applied shift in vowel formant space, independent of shift magnitude. These findings have implications for models of sensorimotor adaptation of speech.

Indexed as

SpeechSpeech PerceptionFeedbackFeedback, SensoryHumansSpeech Acoustics

Identifiers

PMID33379892
PMCPMC7738200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.