Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33379658›Full record

ArticleOptics express2020

Structure-dependent amplification for denoising and background correction in Fourier ptychographic microscopy.

Rémy Claveau, Petru Manescu, Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes, Michael Shaw

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rémy Claveau
Petru Manescu
Delmiro Fernandez-Reyes
Michael Shaw

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fourier Ptychographic Microscopy (FPM) allows high resolution imaging using iterative phase retrieval to recover an estimate of the complex object from a series of images captured under oblique illumination. FPM is particularly sensitive to noise and uncorrected background signals as it relies on combining information from brightfield and noisy darkfield (DF) images. In this article we consider the impact of different noise sources in FPM and show that inadequate removal of the DF background signal and associated noise are the predominant cause of artefacts in reconstructed images. We propose a simple solution to FPM background correction and denoising that outperforms existing methods in terms of image quality, speed and simplicity, whilst maintaining high spatial resolution and sharpness of the reconstructed image. Our method takes advantage of the data redundancy in real space within the acquired dataset to boost the signal-to-background ratio in the captured DF images, before optimally suppressing background signal. By incorporating differentially denoised images within the classic FPM iterative phase retrieval algorithm, we show that it is possible to achieve efficient removal of background artefacts without suppression of high frequency information. The method is tested using simulated data and experimental images of thin blood films, bone marrow and liver tissue sections. Our approach is non-parametric, requires no prior knowledge of the noise distribution and can be directly applied to other hardware platforms and reconstruction algorithms making it widely applicable in FPM.

Identifiers

PMID33379658
PMCPMC7771892
OpenAlexW3092199698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.