Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33379205›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Re-Thinking the Role of Government Information Intervention in the COVID-19 Pandemic: An Agent-Based Modeling Analysis.

Yao Lu, Zheng Ji, Xiaoqi Zhang, Yanqiao Zheng, Han Liang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Three-party game and simulation analysis of health-related information quality regulation in public health emergencies].Beijing da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Peking University. Health sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yao LuDong Fureng Economic and Social Development School, Wuhan University, Beijing 100010, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3360-8413
Zheng JiNational School of Development, Southeast University, Nanjing 210000, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5333-4168
Xiaoqi ZhangNational School of Development, Southeast University, Nanjing 210000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4708-2854
Yanqiao ZhengSchool of Finance, Zhejiang University of Finance and Economics, Hangzhou 310018, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-4942
Han LiangNational School of Development, Southeast University, Nanjing 210000, China.
Southeast University · CNWuhan University · CNZhejiang University of Finance and Economics · CN

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities in China 2242020S30024Ministry of Education in China Project of Humanities and Social Sciences 20YJC790176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic imposes new challenges on the capability of governments in intervening with the information dissemination and reducing the risk of infection outbreak. To reveal the complexity behind government intervention decision, we build a bi-layer network diffusion model for the information-disease dynamics that were intervened in and conduct a full space simulation to illustrate the trade-off faced by governments between information disclosing and blocking. The simulation results show that governments prioritize the accuracy of disclosed information over the disclosing speed when there is a high-level medical recognition of the virus and a high public health awareness, while, for the opposite situation, more strict information blocking is preferred. Furthermore, an unaccountable government tends to delay disclosing, a risk-averse government prefers a total blocking, and a low government credibility will discount the effect of information disclosing and aggravate the situation. These findings suggest that information intervention is indispensable for containing the outbreak of infectious disease, but its effectiveness depends on a complicated way on both external social/epidemic factors and the governments' internal preferences and governance capability, for which more thorough investigations are needed in the future.

Indexed as

COVID-19GovernmentPandemicsDecision MakingHumansInformation DisseminationModels, TheoreticalSystems AnalysisCOVID-19information blockinginformation disclosinginformation interventionsocial network

Identifiers

PMID33379205
PMCPMC7795931
OpenAlexW3118101754

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.