Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33379160›Full record

ArticleVaccines2020

Comparison of Four SARS-CoV-2 Neutralization Assays.

Lydia Riepler, Annika Rössler, Albert Falch, André Volland, Wegene Borena, Dorothee von Laer, Janine Kimpel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lydia RieplerDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Public Health, Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Annika RösslerDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Public Health, Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Albert FalchDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Public Health, Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
André VollandDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Public Health, Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Wegene BorenaDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Public Health, Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8011-5825
Dorothee von LaerDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Public Health, Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.
Janine KimpelDepartment of Hygiene, Microbiology and Public Health, Institute of Virology, Medical University of Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5210-7905

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutralizing antibodies are a major correlate of protection for many viruses including the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Thus, vaccine candidates should potently induce neutralizing antibodies to render effective protection from infection. A variety of in vitro assays for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies has been described. However, validation of the different assays against each other is important to allow comparison of different studies. Here, we compared four different SARS-CoV-2 neutralization assays using the same set of patient samples. Two assays used replication competent SARS-CoV-2, a focus forming assay and a TCID

Indexed as

neutralization assayneutralizing antibodiespseudotype virusSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID33379160
PMCPMC7824240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.