Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33379134›Full record

ArticleJournal of personalized medicine2020

Cerebellar GABA Levels and Cognitive Interference in Parkinson's disease and Healthy Comparators.

Federica Piras, Daniela Vecchio, Francesca Assogna, Clelia Pellicano, Valentina Ciullo, Nerisa Banaj, Richard A E Edden, Francesco E Pontieri, Fabrizio Piras, Gianfranco Spalletta

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of personalized medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Topography of Regional Cerebral GABAThe European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Epigenetics of Trauma Transmission and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder: What Does the Evidence Support?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Federica PirasNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Daniela VecchioNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Francesca AssognaNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Clelia PellicanoNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Valentina CiulloNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Nerisa BanajNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6317-8549
Richard A E EddenDepartment of Radiology, Kennedy Krieger Institute 707 North Broadway, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
Francesco E PontieriDepartment of Neuroscience, Mental Health and Sensory Organs (NESMOS), "Sant'Andrea" University Hospital, via di Grottarossa 1035-1037, 00189 Rome, Italy.
Fabrizio PirasNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.
Gianfranco SpallettaNeuropsychiatry Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Behavioral Neurology, IRCCS Santa Lucia Foundation, Via Ardeatina 306/354, 00179 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7432-4249
Fondazione Santa Lucia · ITAzienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea · ITBaylor College of Medicine · USKennedy Krieger Institute · US

Funding

Italian Ministry of Health RC17, RC18, RC19 and RC20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neuroanatomical and molecular substrates for cognitive impairment in Parkinson Disease (PD) are far from clear. Evidence suggests a non-dopaminergic basis, and a crucial role for cerebellum in cognitive control in PD. We investigated whether a PD cognitive marker (response inhibition) was differently controlled by g-amino butyric acid (GABA) and/or by glutamate-glutamine (Glx) levels in the cerebellum of idiopathic PD patients, and healthy comparators (HC). Magnetic resonance spectroscopy of GABA/Glx (MEGA-PRESS acquisition sequence) was performed at 3 Tesla, and response inhibition assessed by the Stroop Word-Color Test (SWCT) and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Linear correlations between cerebellar GABA/Glx levels, SWCT time/error interference effects and WCST perseverative errors were performed to test differences between correlation coefficients in PD and HC. Results showed that higher levels of mean cerebellar GABA were associated to SWCT increased time and error interference effects in PD, and the contrary in HC. Such effect dissociated by hemisphere, while correlation coefficients differences were significant in both right and left cerebellum. We conclude that MRS measured levels of cerebellar GABA are related in PD patients with decreased efficiency in filtering task-irrelevant information. This is crucial for developing pharmacological treatments for PD to potentially preserve cognitive functioning.

Indexed as

cerebellumcognitionGABAergic signalingMRSParkinson’s Diseaseresponse inhibition

Identifiers

PMID33379134
PMCPMC7823866
OpenAlexW3116841994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.