Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33378765›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2021

The status of causality in biological databases: data resources and data retrieval possibilities to support logical modeling.

Vasundra Touré, Åsmund Flobak, Anna Niarakis, Steven Vercruysse, Martin Kuiper

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasundra TouréDepartment of Biology of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.ORCID 0000-0003-4639-4431
Åsmund FlobakResidential Oncologist and an Associate Professor.ORCID 0000-0002-3357-425X
Anna NiarakisDepartment of Biology, Univ Evry, University of Paris-Saclay, affiliated with the laboratory GenHotel in Genopole campus, and a delegate at the Lifeware Group, INRIA Saclay.ORCID 0000-0002-9687-7426
Steven VercruysseResearcher in computer science and computational biology and focuses on building a bridge between human and computer understanding.ORCID 0000-0002-3136-7353
Martin Kuipersystems biology at the Department of Biology of the Norwegian University of Science and Technology.ORCID 0000-0002-1171-9876
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NOInstitut national de recherche en sciences et technologies du numérique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Causal molecular interactions represent key building blocks used in computational modeling, where they facilitate the assembly of regulatory networks. Logical regulatory networks can be used to predict biological and cellular behaviors by system perturbations and in silico simulations. Today, broad sets of causal interactions are available in a variety of biological knowledge resources. However, different visions, based on distinct biological interests, have led to the development of multiple ways to describe and annotate causal molecular interactions. It can therefore be challenging to efficiently explore various resources of causal interaction and maintain an overview of recorded contextual information that ensures valid use of the data. This review lists the different types of public resources with causal interactions, the different views on biological processes that they represent, the various data formats they use for data representation and storage, and the data exchange and conversion procedures that are available to extract and download these interactions. This may further raise awareness among the targeted audience, i.e. logical modelers and other scientists interested in molecular causal interactions, but also database managers and curators, about the abundance and variety of causal molecular interaction data, and the variety of tools and approaches to convert them into one interoperable resource.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationDatabases, FactualModels, BiologicalSoftwarebiological pathwaycausal interactionscomputational biologydatabasesdata representationinteroperabilitylogical modeling

Identifiers

PMID33378765
PMCPMC8294520
OpenAlexW3117326807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.