ArticleThe New phytologist2021
Quantitative and dynamic cell polarity tracking in plant cells.
Article in The New phytologist, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Scalable quantification of dynamic subcellular spatial organization in single cells across tissues.Research square · 2026Article
- Split-YFP-coupled interaction-dependent TurboID identifies new functions of basal cell polarity inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Cell polarity: cell type-specific regulators, common pathways, and polarized vesicle transport.Leukemia · 2025Review
- Quantitative determination of the spatial distribution of components in single cells with CellDetail.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A cell size threshold triggers commitment to stomatal fate inScience advances · 2023Article
- Asymmetric cell division in plant development.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2023Review
- Article
- Protein polarization: Spatiotemporal precisions in cell division and differentiation.Current opinion in plant biology · 2022Review
- Pole position: How plant cells polarize along the axes.The Plant cell · 2022Review
- Misregulation of MYB16 expression causes stomatal cluster formation by disrupting polarity during asymmetric cell divisions.The Plant cell · 2022Article
- Cell biology of the leaf epidermis: Fate specification, morphogenesis, and coordination.The Plant cell · 2022Review
- Using quantitative methods to understand leaf epidermal development.Quantitative plant biology · 2022Review
- The Arabidopsis stomatal polarity protein BASL mediates distinct processes before and after cell division to coordinate cell size and fate asymmetries.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2021Article
- Stomatal development and genetic expression inHeliyon · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Quantitative information on the spatiotemporal distribution of polarised proteins is central for understanding cell-fate determination, yet collecting sufficient data for statistical analysis is difficult to accomplish with manual measurements. Here we present Polarity Measurement (Pome), a semi-automated pipeline for the quantification of cell polarity and demonstrate its application to a variety of developmental contexts. Pome analysis reveals that, during asymmetric cell divisions in the Arabidopsis thaliana stomatal lineage, polarity proteins BASL and BRXL2 are more asynchronous and less mutually dependent than previously thought. A similar analysis of the linearly arrayed stomatal lineage of Brachypodium distachyon revealed that the MAPKKK BdYDA1 is segregated and polarised following asymmetrical divisions. Our results demonstrate that Pome is a versatile tool, which by itself or combined with tissue-level studies and advanced microscopy techniques can help to uncover new mechanisms of cell polarity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.