Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33378411›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Estimation of non-constant variance in isothermal titration calorimetry using an ITC measurement model.

Xiujie Ge, Lan Chen, Dexing Li, Renxiao Liu, Guanglu Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xiujie GeCAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, P. R. China.
Lan ChenCAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, P. R. China.
Dexing LiCAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, P. R. China.
Renxiao LiuCAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, P. R. China.
Guanglu GeCAS Key Laboratory of Standardization and Measurement for Nanotechnology, CAS Center for Excellence in Nanoscience, National Center for Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) is the gold standard for accurate measurement of thermodynamic parameters in solution reactions. In the data processing of ITC, the non-constant variance of the heat requires special consideration. The variance function approach has been successfully applied in previous studies, but is found to fail under certain conditions in this work. Here, an explicit ITC measurement model consisting of main thermal effects and error components has been proposed to quantitatively evaluate and predict the non-constant variance of the heat data under various conditions. Monte Carlo simulation shows that the ITC measurement model provides higher accuracy and flexibility than variance function in high c-value reactions or with additional error components, for example, originated from the fluctuation of the concentrations or other properties of the solutions. The experimental design of basic error evaluation is optimized accordingly and verified by both Monte Carlo simulation and experiments. An easy-to-run Python source code is provided to illustrate the establishment of the ITC measurement model and the estimation of heat variances. The accurate and reliable non-constant variance of heat is helpful to the application of weighted least squares regression, the proper evaluation or selection of the reaction model.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalThermodynamicsCalorimetryComputer SimulationMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID33378411
PMCPMC7773272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.