Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33378406›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2020

The exploration of size and toddler interaction with liquid laundry detergent capsules.

Annalise Richmond, David C Schwebel, Casie H Morgan, Zhiwu W Liang, Alice Boutoille, Pablo Buso, Ana Mata, Gerard Stijntjes

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Annalise RichmondProcter and Gamble, Strombeek Bever, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2408-9129
David C SchwebelDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-2141-8970
Casie H MorganDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States of America.
Zhiwu W LiangProcter and Gamble, Strombeek Bever, Belgium.
Alice BoutoilleProcter and Gamble, Strombeek Bever, Belgium.
Pablo BusoAiju AIJU, Technological Institute for children's products & leisure, Alicante, Spain.
Ana MataAiju AIJU, Technological Institute for children's products & leisure, Alicante, Spain.
Gerard StijntjesProcter and Gamble, Strombeek Bever, Belgium.
Procter & Gamble (Belgium) · BEUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid laundry capsules have been involved in multiple poisoning incidents with young children in the home. There are a range of contributing factors for these incidents, including influences from industry, culture, home environments, and parenting/supervision. There also are influences from children's behaviour and decisions in reaction to potential hazards. Previous research examined the influence of capsule product appearance and colour on children's behaviour around hazardous household items, but little research examines the influence of product size. This research explored if differences in the size of liquid laundry capsules result in different levels of toddler interaction. We compared two commercially available capsule designs that are identical in physical appearance but differ in physical size. Our research was conducted using three studies: Study 1, forced-choice test in an out-of-context laboratory setting; Study 2, an ecologically-valid, simulated real-world setting replicating a home laundry cabinet with a container of capsules left open; and Study 3, a second ecologically-valid study replicating a home laundry cabinet, this time with a capsule left outside its container. Capsule interaction was measured by grasping choice among samples of 156 toddlers ages 9-36 months. The same sample was used for Studies 1 and 2, and a second identically sized sample recruited for Study 3. Results from Study 1 indicated toddlers selected the small (49.8% selection) and large (50.2%) capsule with nearly identical frequency. Study 2 largely replicated Study 1: Toddlers selected the small capsule or container of small capsules 26.8% of the time and the large capsule or container of large capsules 22.3% of the time. Study 3 also replicated previous findings: Toddlers selected the smaller capsule 18.0% of the time and the larger 19.2%. We discuss study results, which suggest no appreciable difference in toddler's grasping choice to smaller versus larger laundry capsules.

Indexed as

Child BehaviorCapsulesChild, PreschoolChoice BehaviorDetergentsFemaleHumansInfantMalePoisoningCapsulesDetergents

Identifiers

PMID33378406
PMCPMC7773262
OpenAlexW3117710089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.